Gongsun Chou II

公孫丑下 · Mencius

Original Chinese text from Chinese Wikisource (public domain). The translation is machine-made and may contain errors. · Original text ↗

Gongsun Chou II

1

Mencius said: "Favorable weather is less important than advantageous terrain, and advantageous terrain is less important than unity among the people. A city of three li with an outer wall of seven li may be surrounded and attacked yet not conquered. When one surrounds and attacks a city, one must surely have favorable weather on one's side, yet the city is not conquered—this shows that favorable weather is less important than advantageous terrain. It is not that the walls are not high, nor that the moats are not deep, nor that the arms and armor are not strong and sharp, nor that the grain and provisions are not plentiful, yet the defenders abandon and flee—this shows that advantageous terrain is less important than unity among the people. Therefore I say: To confine the people within a state, one does not rely on the boundaries of the borders; to secure a state, one does not rely on the strategic passes of mountains and rivers; to awe the world, one does not rely on the sharpness of weapons and arms. One who has the Way will have much support; one who lacks the Way will have little support. When support reaches its lowest point, even his own relatives will turn against him; when support reaches its highest point, the whole world will submit to him. With the submission of the whole world, one attacks those whose own relatives have turned against them. Thus the gentleman either does not fight, or if he does fight, he is sure to win."

2

Mencius was about to go to court to see the king. The king sent someone to say: "I had intended to come and visit you, but I have a cold and cannot withstand the wind. This morning I will hold court. I do not know whether you might allow me to have an audience with you."

Mencius replied: "Unfortunately I am ill and cannot attend court."

The next day he went out to offer condolences at the home of Master Dongguo. Gongsun Chou said: "Yesterday you excused yourself on grounds of illness; today you go to offer condolences. Perhaps this is not quite right?"

Mencius said: "Yesterday I was ill; today I have recovered. Why should I not offer condolences?"

The king sent someone to inquire about his illness, and a doctor came. Meng Zhongzi replied: "Yesterday there was a royal summons, but I had the worry of gathering firewood and could not attend court. Now my illness has slightly improved, and I hasten to go to court; I do not know whether I will be able to arrive." He then sent several people to intercept Mencius on the road and said: "Please by all means do not return home but go to court."

Having no choice, Mencius went to stay at the home of Jing Chou.

Master Jing said: "Within the family there is the relation of father and son; outside there is the relation of ruler and subject—these are the great moral relationships of mankind. Between father and son, kindness prevails; between ruler and subject, respect prevails. I have seen the king's respect for you, but I have not seen the way in which you show respect to the king."

Mencius said: "Ah! What is this you say? Among the people of Qi, no one speaks of benevolence and righteousness to the king. Is it that they think benevolence and righteousness are not good? In their hearts they say, 'This man is not worth speaking to about benevolence and righteousness'—there is no disrespect greater than this. I would not dare to present anything other than the way of Yao and Shun before the king, and so among the people of Qi, no one shows greater respect to the king than I do."

Master Jing said: "No, that is not what I meant. The Rites say: 'When the father summons, do not delay with a promise; when the ruler commands a summons, do not wait to harness the carriage.' You were certainly going to attend court, yet upon hearing the royal command you did not go after all. It seems that this is not quite in accord with the Rites."

Mencius said: "Do you refer to this? Zengzi said: 'The wealth of Jin and Chu cannot be matched. They have their wealth; I have my benevolence. They have their rank; I have my righteousness. Why should I feel myself lacking?' Would Zengzi have said something that was not right? There is, perhaps, a principle in this. There are three things held as preeminent in the world: rank, age, and virtue. At court, nothing is more preeminent than rank; in the village community, nothing is more preeminent than age; in assisting the world and leading the people, nothing is more preeminent than virtue. How can one who possesses one of these presume to slight the other two? Therefore, a ruler who is about to accomplish great things must have subjects whom he cannot summon. When he wishes to consult with them, he goes to him. He honors virtue and delights in the Way—if he is not like this, he is not sufficient to accomplish great things. Thus, with Tang and Yi Yin, Tang studied under him and then made him a minister, and so he became king without great labor; with Duke Huan and Guan Zhong, Duke Huan studied under him and then made him a minister, and so he became hegemon without great labor. Now, throughout the world, the lands are comparable and the virtues equal—none can claim superiority over another. This is for no other reason than that they prefer to employ those whom they can instruct, and do not prefer to employ those from whom they should receive instruction. With Tang and Yi Yin, and Duke Huan and Guan Zhong, the rulers did not dare to summon them. If even Guan Zhong could not be summoned, how much less one who would not act as Guan Zhong did!"

3

Chen Zhen asked: "Previously, when you were in Qi, the king presented you with a hundred yi of gold and you did not accept it. In Song, he presented you with seventy yi and you accepted it. In Xue, he presented you with fifty yi and you accepted it. If your refusal on the previous occasion was right, then your acceptance on these later occasions was wrong; if your acceptance on these later occasions was right, then your refusal on the previous occasion was wrong. You must, sir, stand on one side or the other of this."

Mencius said: "Both were right. When I was in Song, I was about to undertake a long journey. Travelers must be given a parting gift, and the message said, 'A parting gift is presented.' Why should I not accept it? When I was in Xue, I had concerns about my safety, and the message said, 'Having heard of your concerns, weapons are presented for your protection.' Why should I not accept it? As for Qi, there was no proper occasion. To present a gift without a proper occasion is to buy a man. How could a gentleman be bought with a gift?"

4

Mencasu went to Pinglu and said to its governor: "If one of your men-at-arms loses his position three times in a single day, would you dismiss him?"

The governor said: "I would not wait for three times."

"Then you yourself have lost your position many times," Mencasu said. "In years of famine and dearth, your people—the old and weak—are cast into the ditches and gullies, while the strong scatter to the four quarters—nearly a thousand of them."

The governor said: "This is not something Ju Xin has the power to remedy."

Mencasu said: "Now suppose there is a man who receives another's cattle and sheep and tends them as a herdsman. Must he then seek for them pasture and fodder? If he cannot find pasture and fodder, does he return them to their owner, or does he stand by and watch them die?"

The governor said: "Then this is Ju Xin's fault."

On another day, Mencasu had an audience with the king and said: "Among the governors of your cities, I know five. The only one who knows his own fault is Kong Ju Xin. Allow me to recount this to you."

The king said: "Then this is my fault."

5

Mencius said to Qi Wa: "Your resigning the post of magistrate of Lingqiu and requesting the post of commandant of justice seemed appropriate, as it would allow you to speak your mind. Now that several months have passed, is it still not possible to speak?"

Qi Wa remonstrated with the king but was not heeded, and so he resigned his office and left.

The people of Qi said: "What he did for Qi Wa was good indeed, but what he did for himself—we do not know."

Gongduzi reported this to Mencius.

Mencius said: "I have heard: One who has the duty of office and fails to fulfill his responsibilities should resign; one who has the duty of giving counsel and fails to have his counsel heeded should resign. I have no duty of office and no duty of giving counsel—whether I advance or retreat, do I not have ample freedom and to spare?"

6

Mencius was serving as a minister in Qi. He went to offer condolences in Teng, and the king sent the governor of Gai, Wang Huan, to accompany him as assistant envoy. Wang Huan saw him morning and evening, but on the road between Qi and Teng, Mencasu never once spoke with him about the business of the mission.

Gongsun Chou said: "The position of minister in Qi is not a small one, and the road between Qi and Teng is not a short one. Yet on the return journey you never once spoke with him about the business of the mission. Why is that?"

7

Mencius traveled from Qi to bury his mother in Lu. Upon returning to Qi, he stopped at Ying. Chong Yu said, "Previously, I failed to realize my own incompetence and was entrusted by you with overseeing the coffin-making. When the work was urgent, I did not dare to ask questions. Now I venture to raise a matter: the wood seems too fine."

Mencius said, "In ancient times, there were no fixed rules for coffins and outer coffins. In middle antiquity, the coffin was seven inches thick, and the outer coffin matched this. This applied from the Son of Heaven down to the common people. It was not merely for outward beauty—only then could the heart's full expression be achieved. Without the proper materials, one could not feel at peace; without sufficient means, one could not feel at peace. To have both the materials and the means was required. The ancients all followed this practice—why should I alone act otherwise? Moreover, to prevent the earth from touching the deceased's skin, does this not bring satisfaction to the heart? I have heard that a gentleman would never stint on account of the world when it comes to his parents."

8

Shen Tong asked Mencius privately, "May Yan be attacked?"

Mencius said, "Yes. Zikuai had no right to give Yan to another, and Zhi had no right to receive Yan from Zikuai. Suppose there were a scholar here whom you favored, and without informing the king you privately bestowed upon him your own salary and rank—and suppose that scholar, without any royal command, also privately accepted them from you—would that be permissible? How is this case any different?"

The people of Qi attacked Yan. Someone asked, "Did you encourage Qi to attack Yan?"

Mencius said, "No. Shen Tong asked, 'May Yan be attacked?' I answered, 'Yes,' and he proceeded to attack. Had he asked, 'Who may attack Yan?' I would have answered, 'Only a Heaven-appointed minister may attack Yan.' Suppose someone killed a person and another asked, 'May this man be executed?' I would answer, 'Yes.' Had they asked, 'Who may execute him?' I would answer, 'Only a chief magistrate may execute him.' Now, for Qi to attack Yan with the same flaws as Yan—how could I have encouraged that?"

9

The people of Yan rebelled. King Xuan said, "I am deeply ashamed before Mencius."

Chen Jia said, "Let Your Majesty not worry. Does Your Majesty consider himself as wise and benevolent as the Duke of Zhou?"

The King said, "What! What kind of talk is this?"

Chen Jia said, "The Duke of Zhou sent Guan Shu to oversee Yin, and Guan Shu rebelled with Yin. If he knew and still sent him, that was unbenevolent; if he did not know and sent him, that was unwise. Even the Duke of Zhou did not fully achieve benevolence and wisdom—how much less so Your Majesty? Allow me to go and explain this to Mencius."

Chen Jia went to see Mencius and asked, "What kind of man was the Duke of Zhou?"

Mencius said, "He was an ancient sage."

"Did he send Guan Shu to oversee Yin, and did Guan Shu rebel with Yin?"

"Yes."

"Did the Duke of Zhou know he would rebel and still send him?"

"No, he did not know."

"Then even a sage can have faults?"

Mencius said, "The Duke of Zhou was the younger brother; Guan Shu was the elder brother. Was the Duke of Zhou's error not understandable? Moreover, when the gentlemen of antiquity committed a fault, they corrected it. When the gentlemen of today commit a fault, they persist in it. The faults of the ancient gentlemen were like eclipses of the sun and moon—all the people saw them. When they made amends, all the people looked up to them. As for the gentlemen of today, do they not merely persist in their faults? They go on to make excuses for them."

10

Mencius resigned his office and prepared to leave for home.

The King went to see him and said, "In the past I wished to meet you but could not; then I had the joy of serving alongside you at court. Now you abandon me and return home. I do not know whether it will be possible to continue this and meet you again."

Mencius replied, "I would not presume to request it, but it is indeed my sincere wish."

On another day, the King said to Shi Zi, "I wish to establish Mencius with a residence in the capital, support his disciples with ten thousand zhong of grain, and have all the officers and people look up to him as a model. Why do you not speak to him on my behalf?"

Shi Zi conveyed this message through Chen Zi, and Chen Zi reported Shi Zi's words to Mencius.

Mencius said "I see. But how does Shi Zi know this would not do? If I desired wealth, would I have refused a stipend of a hundred thousand and accepted ten thousand—would that be desiring wealth? Ji Sun said, 'How strange is Zishu Yi! When he himself held office and was not employed, that should have been the end of it. Yet he had his sons and younger brothers appointed as ministers. Who does not desire wealth and honor? But he alone sought a private monopoly within wealth and honor.' In ancient times, the market worked by exchanging what one had for what one lacked, and officials merely managed it. Then there appeared a low fellow who sought out a vantage point, climbed it, and looked left and right to capture all the market's profits. Everyone thought him base, and so they levied taxes on him. The taxation of merchants began with this low fellow."

11

Mencius, leaving Qi, stayed overnight at Zhou. Someone who wished to detain him on the King's behalf came and sat down to speak. Mencius did not respond, but leaned on his armrest and lay down.

The visitor was displeased and said, "I prepared myself with a day's fasting before daring to speak, yet you lie down and will not listen. I beg leave never to see you again."

Mencius said "Sit down. Let me speak plainly to you. In the past, if Duke Mu of Lu did not keep someone by the side of Zisi, he could not keep Zisi settled. If Xie Liu and Shen Xiang did not have someone by the side of Duke Mu, they could not keep themselves secure. You, sir, make plans for an elder, but you do not go so far as Duke Mu did for Zisi. Is it you who cuts off the elder, or is it the elder who cuts you off?"

12

Mencius left Qi. Yin Shi said to others, "If he did not know that the King could not become a Tang or a Wu, then he lacked understanding. If he knew it was impossible yet still came, he was seeking favor. He traveled a thousand li to see the King, failed to find opportunity, and departed—yet he stayed three nights before leaving Zhou. What lingering hesitation! I am displeased by this."

Gao Zi reported this to Mencius.

Mencius said, "How could Yin Shi understand me? I traveled a thousand li to see the King—that was what I desired. I failed to find opportunity and left—was that what I desired? I had no choice. Even after staying three nights before leaving Zhou, in my heart I still felt it was too slow. Perhaps the King might change! If he were to change, he would certainly recall me. But when I left Zhou, the King did not send after me—only then did I firmly resolve to go home. Even so, how could I abandon the King? The King is capable of doing good. If the King were to employ me, would not only the people of Qi be at peace? The people of all under Heaven would be at peace. Perhaps the King might change! I looked for it daily! Am I one of those petty men who, when his counsel is rejected by his lord, flies into a rage, shows his resentment on his face, and travels the whole day's journey before stopping to rest?"

When Yin Shi heard this, he said, "I am truly a petty man."

13

Mencius left Qi, and on the road Chong Yu asked, saying, "It appears that you, Master, are not quite at ease in your mind. But I have heard you say before that a gentleman does not murmur against Heaven, nor blame others."

Mencius replied, "That was one time, and this is another. It is the way that every five hundred years a true king should arise, and in the interval there should appear men of great distinction. From the founding of the Zhou dynasty, more than seven hundred years have now passed. The number of years considered as a period is more than enough, and if we examine the times, the conditions are ripe for such a rise. It would seem that Heaven does not yet wish to bring peace to the world. If it wished to bring peace to the world, who is there in the present age besides me? Why should I be discomfited?"

14

Mencius left Qi and resided in Xiu. Gongsun Chou asked, saying, "Is it the way of the ancients to take office and yet not to receive a salary?"

Mencius replied, "No. When I had my interview with the king at Chong, I withdrew with the intention of leaving, and I did not wish to change that intention, so I did not receive the salary. Soon after, there was a military expedition, and I could not ask for permission to leave. My remaining long in Qi was not my purpose."

公孫丑下

1

孟子曰:「天時不如地利,地利不如人和。三里之城,七里之郭,環而攻之而不勝;夫環而攻之,必有得天時者矣,然而不勝者,是天時不如地利也。城非不高也,池非不深也,兵革非不堅利也,米粟非不多也,委而去之,是地利不如人和也。故曰:域民不以封疆之界,固國不以山溪之險,威天下不以兵革之利。得道者多助,失道者寡助。寡助之至,親戚畔之;多助之至,天下順之。以天下之所順,攻親戚之所畔,故君子有不戰,戰必勝矣。」

2

孟子將朝王。王使人來曰:「寡人如就見者也,有寒疾,不可以風;朝將視朝,不識可使寡人得見乎?」

對曰:「不幸而有疾,不能造朝。」

明日出弔於東郭氏。公孙丑曰:「昔者辭以病,今日弔,或者不可乎?」

曰:「昔者疾,今日愈,如之何不弔?」

王使人問疾,醫來。孟仲子對曰:「昔者有王命,有采薪之憂,不能造朝。今病小愈,趨造於朝;我不識能至否乎?」使數人要於路曰:「請必無歸而造於朝。」

不得已而之景丑氏宿焉。

景子曰:「內則父子,外則君臣,人之大倫也。父子主恩,君臣主敬。丑見王之敬子也,未見所以敬王也。」

曰:「惡!是何言也!齊人無以仁義與王言者,豈以仁義為不美也?其心曰『是何足與言仁義也』云爾,則不敬莫大乎是。我非堯舜之道不敢以陳於王前,故齊人莫如我敬王也。」

景子曰:「否,非此之謂也。《禮》曰:『父召無諾;君命召,不俟駕。』固將朝也,聞王命而遂不果,宜與夫禮若不相似然。」

曰:「豈謂是與?曾子曰:『晉楚之富,不可及也。彼以其富,我以吾仁;彼以其爵,我以吾義,吾何慊乎哉?』夫豈不義而曾子言之?是或一道也。天下有達尊三:爵一,齒一,德一。朝廷莫如爵,鄉黨莫如齒,輔世長民莫如德。惡得有其一,以慢其二哉?故將大有為之君,必有所不召之臣;欲有謀焉則就之。其尊德樂道,不如是不足以有為也。故湯之於伊尹,學焉而後臣之,故不勞而王;桓公之於管仲,學焉而後臣之,故不勞而霸;今天下地醜德齊,莫能相尚。無他,好臣其所教,而不好臣其所受教。湯之於伊尹,桓公之於管仲,則不敢召;管仲且猶不可召,而況不為管仲者乎?」

3

陳臻問曰:「前日於齊,王饋兼金一百而不受;於宋,饋七十鎰而受;於薛,饋五十鎰而受。前日之不受是,則今日之受非也;今日之受是,則前日之不受非也;夫子必居一於此矣。」

孟子曰:「皆是也。當在宋也,予將有遠行;行者必以贐,辭曰『饋贐』,予何為不受?當在薛也,予有戒心,辭曰『聞戒故為兵饋之』,予何為不受?若於齊則未有處也。無處而饋之,是貨之也;焉有君子而可以貨取乎?」

4

孟子之平陸,謂其大夫曰:「子之持戟之士,一日而三失伍,則去之否乎?」

曰:「不待三。」

「然則子之失伍也亦多矣。兇年饑歲,子之民老羸轉於溝壑,壯者散而之四方者幾千人矣。」

曰:「此非距心之所得為也。」

曰:「今有受人之牛羊而為之牧之者,則必為之求牧與芻矣。求牧與芻而不得,則反諸其人乎?抑亦立而視其死與?」

曰:「此則距心之罪也。」

他日,見於王曰:「王之為都者,臣知五人焉。知其罪者,惟孔距心。為王誦之。」

王曰:「此則寡人之罪也。」

5

孟子謂蚔蛙曰:「子之辭靈丘而請士師,似也,為其可以言也。今既數月矣,未可以言與?」

蚔蛙諫於王而不用,致為臣而去。

齊人曰:「所以為蚔蛙,則善矣;所以自為,則吾不知也。」

公都子以告。

曰:「吾聞之也:有官守者,不得其職則去;有言責者,不得其言則去。我無官守,我無言責也,則吾進退豈不綽綽然有餘裕哉?」

6

孟子為卿於齊,出弔於滕,王使蓋大夫王驩為輔行。王驩朝暮見,反齊、滕之路,未嘗與之言行事也。

公孫丑曰:「齊卿之位,不為小矣;齊、滕之路,不為近矣。反之而未嘗與言行事,何也?」

曰:「夫既或治之,予何言哉?」

7

孟子自齊葬於魯。反於齊,止於嬴。充虞請曰:「前日不知虞之不肖,使虞敦匠事;嚴,虞不敢請。今愿竊有請也:木若以美然。」

曰:「古者棺槨無度,中古棺七寸,槨稱之,自天子達於庶人。非直為觀美也,然後盡於人心。不得,不可以為悅;無財,不可以為悅。得之為有財。古之人皆用之,吾何為獨不然?且比化者,無使土親膚,於人心獨無恔乎?吾聞之君子:不以天下儉其親。」

8

沈同以其私問曰:「燕可伐與?」

孟子曰:「可。子噲不得與人燕,子之不得受燕於子噲。有仕於此,而子悅之,不告於王,而私與之吾子之祿爵;夫士也,亦無王命而私受之於子,則可乎?何以異於是?」

齊人伐燕。或問曰:「勸齊伐燕,有諸?」

曰:「未也。沈同問:『燕可伐與?』吾應之曰:『可。』彼然而伐之也。彼如曰:『孰可以伐之?』則將應之曰:『為天吏則可以伐之。』今有殺人者,或問之曰:『人可殺與?』則將應之曰:『可。』彼如曰:『孰可以殺之?』則將應之曰:『為士師則可以殺之。』今以燕伐燕,何為勸之哉?」

9

燕人畔,王曰:「吾甚慚於孟子。」

陳賈曰:「王無患焉,王自以為與周公,孰仁且智?」

王曰:「惡!是何言也!」

曰:「周公使管叔監殷,管叔以殷畔。知而使之,是不仁也;不知而使之,是不智也。仁智,周公未之盡也,而況於王乎?賈請見而解之。」

見孟子問曰:「周公何人也?」

曰:「古聖人也。」

曰:「使管叔監殷,管叔以殷畔也,有諸?」

曰:「然。」

曰:「周公知其將畔而使之與?」

曰:「不知也。」

「然則聖人且有過與?」

曰:「周公,弟也;管叔,兄也。周公之過,不亦宜乎?且古之君子,過則改之;今之君子,過則順之。古之君子,其過也如日月之食,民皆見之;及其更也,民皆仰之。今之君子,豈徒順之?又從為之辭。」

10

孟子致為臣而歸。

王就見孟子曰:「前日愿見而不可得,得侍同朝甚喜。今又棄寡人而歸,不識可以繼此而得見乎?」

對曰:「不敢請耳,固所愿也。」

他日王謂時子曰:「我欲中國而授孟子室,養弟子以萬鍾,使諸大夫國人皆有所矜式。子盍為我言之?」

時子因陳子而以告孟子,陳子以時子之言告孟子。

孟子曰:「然。夫時子惡知其不可也?如使予欲富,辭十萬而受萬,是為欲富乎?季孫曰:『異哉子叔疑!使己為政,不用,則亦已矣,又使其子弟為卿。人亦孰不欲富貴?而獨於富貴之中有私龍斷焉。』古之為市也,以其所有易其所無者,有司者治之耳。有賤丈夫焉,必求龍斷而登之,以左右望而罔市利。人皆以為賤,故從而征之。征商自此賤丈夫始矣。」

11

孟子去齊,宿於晝。有欲為王留行者,坐而言。不應,隱几而臥。

客不悅曰:「弟子齊宿而後敢言;夫子臥而不聽;請勿復敢見矣。」

曰:「坐。我明語子:昔者魯繆公無人乎子思之側,則不能安子思;泄柳、申詳無人乎繆公之側,則不能安其身。子為長者慮,而不及子思。子絕長者乎?長者絕子乎?」

12

孟子去齊,尹士語人曰:「不識王之不可以為湯、武,則是不明也;識其不可然且至,則是干澤也。千里而見王,不遇故去;三宿而後出晝,是何濡滯也!士則茲不悅。」

高子以告。

曰:「夫尹士惡知予哉?千里而見王,是予所欲也。不遇故去,豈予所欲哉?予不得已也。予三宿而出晝,於予心猶以為速。王庶幾改之!王如改諸,則必反予。夫出晝而王不予追也,予然後浩然有歸志。予雖然,豈舍王哉?王由足用為善;王如用予,則豈徒齊民安?天下之民舉安。王庶幾改之!予日望之!予豈若是小丈夫然哉!諫於其君而不受,則怒,悻悻然見於其面,去則窮日之力而後宿哉?」

尹士聞之,曰:「士誠小人也。」

13

孟子去齊,充虞路問曰:「夫子若有不豫色然。前日虞聞諸夫子曰:『君子不怨天,不尤人。』」

曰:「彼一時,此一時也。五百年必有王者興,其間必有名世者。由周而來,七百有餘歲矣;以其數則過矣,以其時考之則可矣。夫天,未欲平治天下也,如欲平治天下,當今之世,舍我其誰也?吾何為不豫哉?」

14

孟子去齊,居休。公孫丑問曰:「仕而不受祿,古之道乎?」

曰:「非也。於崇,吾得見王;退而有去志,不欲變,故不受也。繼而有師命,不可以請。久於齊,非我志也。」