How to Read the Records of the Three Kingdoms

讀《三國志》法 · Romance of the Three Kingdoms

Original Chinese text from Chinese Wikisource (public domain). The translation is machine-made and may contain errors. · Original text ↗

How to Read the Records of the Three Kingdoms

On How to Read the *Records of the Three Kingdoms*

When reading the *Records of the Three Kingdoms*, one must understand the distinction between the legitimate line (*zhengtong*), the intercalated cycle (*runyun*), and the usurping states (*jianguo*). What is the legitimate line? It is Shu-Han. What are the usurping states? They are Wu and Wei. What is the intercalated cycle? It is Jin. Why does Wei not qualify as the legitimate line? In terms of territory, the Central Plain should hold primacy; in terms of principle, the Liu family holds primacy. But to judge by territory is not as good as judging by principle. Therefore, to grant the legitimate line to Wei was the error of Sima Guang in his *Comprehensive Mirror*. To grant the legitimate line to Shu was why Zhu Xi's *Gangmu* (*Outline and Details of the Comprehensive Mirror*) is correct. In the *Gangmu*, at the end of Emperor Xian's Jian'an era, it records in large script: "First Year of the Zhangwu Era of Emperor Zhaolie of Later Han," while noting Wu and Wei beneath it. This is because Shu, being of imperial lineage, deserves to be affirmed; Wei, being a state of usurpers, deserves to be rejected. Thus, earlier it records "Liu Bei raising troops in Xuzhou to attack Cao Cao," and later it records "Chancellor of Han, Zhuge Liang, leading a campaign to attack Wei"—and the great principle shines forth clearly for all time. Before the Liu house had perished and before Wei had achieved unification, Wei certainly could not be the legitimate line. After the Liu house had perished and Jin had achieved unification, yet Jin too could not be the legitimate line. Why? Because Jin's ministers slew their lord—no different from Wei—and after but one generation, its mandate was short-lived. It can only be called an intercalated cycle, not a legitimate line. As for Eastern Jin, ruling from a corner and substituting an ox for a horse [i.e., the scandal of the Sima lineage], it is even less entitled to the legitimate line. Therefore, the absorption of the Three Kingdoms by Jin is like the unification of the Six States by Qin, or the unification of the Five Dynasties by Sui. Qin merely served as a vanguard for Han; Sui merely served as a vanguard for Tang. For the legitimate line of earlier times, Han held primacy, and Qin, Wei, and Jin had no part in it. Likewise, for the legitimate line of later times, Tang and Song held primacy, and Song, Qi, Liang, Chen, Sui, Liang, Tang, Jin, Han, and Zhou all had no part in it. Moreover, it is not merely that Wei and Jin fall short of Han as the legitimate line—even Tang and Song fall short of Han. Emperor Yang of Sui was without principle, and Tang replaced him; yet one regrets that Tang could not manifestly do as Zhou did when it replaced Shang. Instead, [Tang Gaozu] took the title of Duke of Tang and accepted the Nine Bestowments, treading the vulgar path of Wei and Jin. Thus, the legitimacy by which it gained the empire was inferior to that of Han. As for Song, it founded its state on loyalty and magnanimity, and many great ministers and great scholars emerged from among its people. Therefore, those who assess such matters grant the legitimate line to Song. Yet throughout Song's history, the Sixteen Prefectures of Yan and Yun were never incorporated into its domain—its scope was already inferior to Tang's. Moreover, at the Chenqiao Mutiny, the yellow robe was added to [Zhao Kuangyin]'s body, and he seized the empire from the hands of an orphan and a widow. Thus, the legitimacy by which it gained the empire was also inferior to that of Han. If even Tang and Song fall short of Han, what need to speak of Wei and Jin? Emperor Gaozu rose by overthrowing the tyrannical Qin and attacking Xiang Yu for killing Emperor Yi. Emperor Guangwu restored the old order by punishing Wang Mang. Emperor Zhaolie preserved the Han sacrifices in Xichuan by attacking Cao Cao. When the founding ancestors established the line with legitimacy, the descendants who continued it also acted with legitimacy. One cannot hold that only because Guangwu achieved unification did he represent the legitimate line, while Zhaolie, ruling from a corner, does not. If Zhaolie is the legitimate line, then Liu Yu and Liu Zhiyuan were also descendants of the Liu family—why are they not considered the legitimate line? Because Yu and Zhiyuan's descent from Han was distant and unverifiable, unlike the descent from the Prince of Zhongshan, which is near and can be confirmed. Moreover, both Liu Yu and Liu Zhiyuan gained their states through usurpation and murder, and therefore cannot be ranked alongside Zhaolie. Why does Li Cunxu of Later Tang not qualify as the legitimate line? Because Cunxu was not originally a Li but was granted the surname Li—he is not far removed from the Lü clan [of Lü Zuan] and the ox-substitution of Jin [the Sima scandal], and therefore cannot be ranked alongside Zhaolie either. Why does Li Bian of Southern Tang also not qualify to continue Tang as the legitimate line? Because his lineage was distant and remote, comparable to Yu and Zhiyuan, and therefore he too cannot be ranked alongside Zhaolie. If Li Sheng of Southern Tang cannot continue Tang as the legitimate line, why does Emperor Gaozong of Southern Song alone qualify to continue Song as the legitimate line? Gaozong established a descendant of Taizu as heir, so that the Song mandate would not be severed. Therefore, the legitimate line is granted to him. Gaozong killed Yue Fei and employed Qin Guan, giving no thought whatsoever to the two emperors [held captive]. Yet historians, because he prolonged the Song mandate, still grant him the legitimate line. How much more, then, should Zhaolie, whose ruler and minister were of one mind and swore to punish the traitors of Han, be considered the legitimate line? That Zhaolie is the legitimate line is beyond all doubt. Chen Shou's *Records* did not make this distinction. Therefore, I have taken the middle course of Zhu Xi's *Gangmu* and specially set it right in this *Romance*.

There are many ancient histories, yet people are drawn to read the *Records of the Three Kingdoms* above all others, for the gathering of talents through the ages has never surpassed that of the Three Kingdoms period. To see talent matched against no talent is nothing remarkable; to see talent pitted against talent is remarkable. To see talent pitted against talent, yet one talent encountering equals among many is nothing remarkable; to see talent pitted against talent, with all other talents yielding to the supremacy of one talent—that is even more remarkable. I hold that the *Three Kingdoms* contains three marvels, which may be called three unsurpassed figures: Zhuge Liang is one, Guan Yu is one, and Cao Cao is also one. Searching through the records, though worthy ministers abound, none has a name towering through the ages like Zhuge Liang. At leisure, playing the zither and clasping his knees, he possessed the air of a true recluse; in action, with feathered fan and silk headcloth, he never lost his refined bearing. Dwelling in a thatched cottage, he already perceived the tripartition of the realm—such was his grasp of the times; entrusted with the heavy charge of a dying emperor's behest, he marched to Mount Qi six times—such was his fulfillment of human duty. His seven captures and eight formations, his wooden oxen and flowing horses, seemed beyond mortal comprehension, like spirits and ghosts at work; yet his devotion to the uttermost, his resolve fixed even unto death, remained the heart of a loyal minister and a dutiful son. Compared with Guan Zhong and Yue Yi, he surpassed them; compared with Yi Yin and Lü Shang, he combined their virtues—he is the foremost marvel among worthy ministers through the ages.

Searching through the records, though famous generals are as numerous as clouds, none stands above the rest like Guan Yu. Facing the green lamp with the green annals, he displayed the utmost scholarly elegance; with a heart as red as his face, he possessed the utmost heroic spirit. Keeping the candle burning till dawn, men transmitted his great integrity; crossing the river with a single sword to attend a meeting, the world admired his divine might. Traveling a thousand *li* alone, his resolve to repay his lord was firm; releasing Cao Cao at Huarong, his debt of gratitude was weighty. In his dealings, he was as clear as the blue sky and bright sun; in his treatment of others, he was as serene as the clear moon and gentle breeze. His heart possessed Zhao Bian's spirit of burning incense and reporting to the Emperor on High, yet with greater magnanimity; his will possessed Ruan Ji's spirit of showing the white eye in scorn of the world, yet with greater sternness and rectitude—he is the foremost marvel among famous generals through the ages.

Searching through the records, though villainous heroes come in endless succession, none had the wisdom to gather talents and deceive the world like Cao Cao. Listening to Xun Yu's counsel of supporting the throne, he compared himself to King Wen of Zhou—there was something seemingly loyal in that; denouncing Yuan Shu's wrongful assumption of imperial title, he declared himself content as the Duke of Cao—there was something seemingly compliant in that; he did not kill Chen Lin but cherished his talent—there was something seemingly magnanimous in that; he did not pursue Guan Yu but allowed him to fulfill his purpose—there was something seemingly righteous in that. Wang Dun could not employ Guo Pu, yet Cao Cao's ability to win men surpassed him; Huan Wen could not recognize Wang Meng, yet Cao Cao's ability to judge men surpassed him. Though Lin Fu was able to control Lu Shan, he could not match Cao Cao's striking the Wuhuan beyond the frontier; though Han Tuozhou was able to demote Qin Gui, he could not equal Cao Cao's punishing Dong Zhuo while he yet lived. He seized the reins of the state yet preserved the dynasty's name—this differed from Wang Mang's obvious regicide; he left the work of reform for his sons to complete—this surpassed Liu Yu's hasty desire to usurp the Jin—he is the foremost marvel among villainous heroes through the ages.

With these three marvels, the *Three Kingdoms* possesses what all other histories utterly lack. Therefore, having read through all histories, one cannot but delight all the more in reading the *Records of the Three Kingdoms*.

That the Three Kingdoms possesses three unsurpassed figures is already established. Yet beyond these three, I have also surveyed the periods before and after the Three Kingdoms. Were there any who planned strategy within the command tent like Xu Shu and Pang Tong? Were there any who commanded armies like Zhou Yu, Lu Sima, and Sima Yi? Were there any who judged men and foretold events like Guo Jia, Cheng Yu, Xun Yu, Jia Xu, Bu Zhi, Yu Fan, Gu Yong, and Zhang Zhao? Were there any whose martial exploits and generalship surpassed all bounds like Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, Huang Zhong, Yan Yan, Zhang Liao, Xu Huang, Xu Sheng, and Zhu Huan? Were there any who charged into battle with fierce valor that none could withstand like Ma Chao, Ma Dai, Guan Xing, Zhang Bao, Xu Chu, Dian Wei, Zhang He, Xiahou Dun, Huang Gai, Zhou Tai, Gan Ning, Taishi Ci, and Ding Feng? Were there any whose talents were equal and whose worth met in rivalry like Jiang Wei and Deng Ai, matched in wisdom and courage, or Yang Hu and Lu Kang, each commanding with composed restraint? As for moral philosophy, there were Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan; for literary brilliance, Cai Yong and Wang Can; for quick wit, Cao Zhi and Yang Xiu; for early promise, Zhuge Ke and Zhong Hui; for repartee, Qin Mi and Zhang Song; for eloquence, Li Hui and Kan Ze; for fulfilling diplomatic missions without disgrace to their lord, Zhao Zi and Deng Zhi; for composing dispatches and urgent proclamations, Chen Lin and Ruan Yu; for managing complex affairs, Jiang Wan and Dong Yun; for spreading fame and renown, Ma Liang and Shun Shuang; for loving antiquity, Du Yu; for broad learning, Zhang Hua—seek these in other records, and they are not easily found one by one. As for recognizing worth, there was the wisdom of Sima Hui; as for cultivating integrity, there was the loftiness of Guan Ning; as for reclusion, there were the refined seclusion of Cui Zhouping, Shi Guangyuan, and Meng Gongwei; as for defying the treacherous, there was the uprightness of Kong Rong; as for confronting evil, there was the forthrightness of Zhao Yan; as for denouncing the wicked, there was the boldness of Mi Heng; as for cursing the traitor, there was the valor of Ji Ping; as for dying for the state, there were the worthiness of Dong Cheng and Fu Wan; as for sacrificing one's life, there were the integrity of Geng Ji and Wei Huang. A son dying for his father—such was the filial piety of Liu Chen and Guan Ping; a minister dying for his lord—such was the loyalty of Zhuge Zhan and Zhuge Shang; a retainer dying for his commander—such was the righteousness of Zhao Lei and Zhou Cang. Others include prescient counsel like Tian Feng, earnest remonstrance like Wang Lei, unwavering fidelity like Ju Shou, unyielding resolve like Ren Zi, generosity and devotion to friends like Lu Su, undivided loyalty to one's lord like Zhuge Jin, fearlessness before the mighty like Chen Tai, regarding death as returning home like Wang Jing, maintaining singular integrity like Sima Fu—all shining and resplendent, illuminating the pages of history. It is as if the three heroes of Fengpei, the four grey-haired sages of Mount Shang, the generals of the Cloud Terrace, and the guest star of Fuchun from earlier times, and the scholars of Yingzhou, the meritorious ministers of the Qilin Pavilion, the military governor over a cup of wine, and the minister of the execution ground from later dynasties—scattered across a thousand years of successive eras—all converged and gathered together in the single era of the Three Kingdoms. Is this not a great metropolis of talent! To enter the Deng Forest and select famous timber, to wander through the Dark Garden and see heaped jade—there is too much to gather, too much to behold. For the *Three Kingdoms*, I have the sigh of "I have seen enough."

# On Reading the *Records of the Three Kingdoms*

The *Three Kingdoms* is the most masterful work of literature. It narrates the Three Kingdoms, but it does not begin with the Three Kingdoms—the Three Kingdoms must have a beginning of their own, and so it begins with the Emperor of Han. It narrates the Three Kingdoms, but it does not end with the Three Kingdoms—the Three Kingdoms must have an ending of their own, and so it ends with the State of Jin. And not only this: Liu Bei, as a scion of the imperial house, carries on the dynastic line, and so there are imperial kinsmen such as Liu Biao, Liu Zhang, Liu Yao, and Liu Pi to accompany him. Cao Cao, as a powerful minister, monopolizes authority, and so there are those who deposed and installed emperors such as Dong Zhuo, and those who threw the state into chaos such as Li Jue and Guo Si to accompany him. Sun Quan, as a regional lord, divides the tripod, and so there are those who usurped imperial titles such as Yuan Shu, those who held sway as heroes such as Yuan Shao, and those who seized territory such as Lü Bu, Gongsun Zan, Zhang Yang, Zhang Miao, Zhang Lu, and Zhang Xiu to accompany him. Liu Bei and Cao Cao are introduced in the first chapter, while Sun Quan does not appear until the seventh chapter. The Caos establish their capital at Xuchang in the eleventh chapter; the Suns establish their dominion in Jiangdong in the twelfth chapter; and the Lius seize Xichuan only after the sixtieth chapter. If a modern writer of unofficial histories wished to fabricate a *Three Kingdoms* tale from nothing, he would surely begin by narrating the three men at the very outset, and the three men would each occupy a single state. Could anyone achieve such command of what comes before, such insight into what comes after, and such varied maneuvering around the central figures? The events of antiquity naturally contained such undulations, such layers and turns, to compose a peerless work of literature. Therefore, reading the *Three Kingdoms* is truly far superior to reading any other unofficial history.

If one speaks of the founding lords of the Three Kingdoms, all know them to be Liu Bei, Sun Quan, and Cao Cao, yet they do not realize that among them there are various differences. Bei and Cao both built their enterprises through their own efforts, whereas Sun Quan relied on the strength of his father and elder brother—this is the first difference. Bei and Quan both became emperors in their own lifetimes, whereas Cao Cao did not do so himself but left it to his sons and grandsons—this is the second difference. As for the assumption of the imperial title among the Three Kingdoms, only Wei did so early; Shu declared its empire only after Cao Cao had died and Cao Pi had taken the throne, and Wu declared its empire only after Liu Bei had died and Liu Shan had ascended—this is the third difference. As for the mutual contention among the Three Kingdoms, Wu was Shu's neighbor, and Wei was Shu's enemy; Shu and Wu had both peace and war between them, while Shu and Wu had only war and no peace; Wu and Wu had more peace than war, while Wu and Wei had more war than peace—this is the fourth difference. As for the succession among the Three Kingdoms, Shu lasted only two generations, while Wei had five rulers from Cao Pi to Cao Huan, and Wu had four rulers from Sun Quan to Sun Hao—this is the fifth difference. As for the fall of the Three Kingdoms, Wu perished last, while Shu fell first and Wei second. Wei was seized by its own ministers, while Wu and Shu were annexed by their enemies—this is the sixth difference. Nor is this all: between Ce and Quan, the elder brother died and the younger succeeded; between Pi and Zhi, the younger brother was passed over and the elder enthroned; between Bei and Shan, the father was emperor and the son became a captive; between Cao and Pi, the father was a minister and the son became a sovereign—truly, it is a pattern of variation and transformation without fixed rule! Now, an unskilled painter, even when depicting two men, will inevitably make them look alike. An unskilled singer, even when performing two melodies, will inevitably make the tones the same throughout. Literary redundancy is often of this sort. The ancients never had identical events, yet modern writers delight in producing identical prose. Why, then, do they not take up my annotated *Records of the Three Kingdoms* and read it?

The *Three Kingdoms* is a work in which, within the overall beginning and ending, there are six beginnings and six endings. In its narration of Emperor Xian, the deposition and installation by Dong Zhuo forms one beginning, and the usurpation by Cao Pi forms one ending. In its narration of Western Shu, the declaration of empire at Chengdu forms one beginning, and the surrender at Mianzhu forms one ending. In its narration of the three men Liu, Guan, and Zhang, the oath of brotherhood in the Peach Garden forms one beginning, and the entrusting of the orphan at Baidi forms one ending. In its narration of Zhuge Liang, the three visits to thatched cottage forms one beginning, and the six expeditions to Qishan forms one ending. In its narration of the state of Wei, the inauguration of the Huangchu era forms one beginning, and the receipt of the abdication by Sima forms one ending. In its narration of Eastern Wu, the hiding of the imperial seal by Sun Jian forms one beginning, and the surrender with the jade held in the mouth by Sun Hao forms one ending. All these passages interweave and connect with one another—where one side begins, the other has already concluded; where this one has not yet ended, that one has already begun. Reading them, one does not perceive the traces of interruption or continuation, yet examining them, one can discern that they possess a definite structure and method.

The *Three Kingdoms* is a work that possesses the wonder of tracing things to their source and following them to their root. The division into Three Kingdoms arose from the rivalrous establishment of the various warlords. The rivalrous establishment of the warlords arose from Dong Zhuo's throwing the state into chaos. Dong Zhuo threw the state into chaos because He Jin summoned external troops. He Jin summoned external troops because the Ten Eunuchs monopolized power. Therefore, in narrating the Three Kingdoms, one must take the Ten Eunuchs as the starting point. However, when Liu Bei first rose, he was not yet among the warlords but was still among the men of the wilds. The reason heroes gathered and swore brotherhood in the wilds, and the reason the warlords prepared and maintained their armies, was because of the Yellow Turban Rebellion. Therefore, in narrating the Three Kingdoms, one must also take the Yellow Turbans as a starting point. Now, before the Yellow Turbans rose, Heaven had sent down portents and omens as warnings, and there were loyal and far-sighted ministers who spoke frankly and remonstrated bluntly in anticipation. Had the ruler of that time embodied the benevolence of Heaven's heart and heeded the upright counsel of worthy ministers, resolutely dismissing and banishing the Ten Eunuchs, then the Yellow Turbans need not have risen, the heroes of the wilds need not have emerged, the warlords need not have prepared their armies, and the Three Kingdoms need not have been divided. Therefore, in narrating the Three Kingdoms and tracing it back to Emperors Huan and Ling, it is like the source of the Yellow River having its Xingxing Sea.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the marvel of artful convergence and wondrous resolution. Suppose Wei had been absorbed by Shu—this would be what people's hearts most desire. Suppose Shu had perished and Wei had unified the realm—this would be what people's hearts could most ill bear. Yet the will of Heaven neither granted what people's hearts most desired nor fell in line with what they could most ill bear. It specially employed Jin to unify the realm—this is the wondrous working of the Creator. But since Heaven neither blessed the House of Han nor favored Wei, why did it not employ Wu instead, and why must it have employed Jin? The answer is: Wei was a traitor to Han, it is true. Yet Wu slew Lord Guan, seized Jingzhou, and aided Wei in attacking Shu—so Wu too was a traitor to Han. As for Jin's seizure of Wei, it bore a resemblance to avenging the House of Han. Therefore, unifying the realm through Wu would not be as fitting as unifying it through Jin. Moreover, Wu was Wei's enemy, while Jin was Wei's vassal. Wei had a vassal slay his lord, and Jin requited Wei in kind by doing the same thing. This could serve as a warning to all under heaven and for all ages to come. Thus, it would be more gratifying for Wei to be absorbed by its own vassal than to be absorbed by its enemy. This is the artfulness of the Creator. The wondrous surpasses all expectation; the artfulness falls precisely within what men might anticipate. Truly, the Creator may be said to excel at composition. A writer of today could never achieve such wondrous turns or such artfulness. Since that is so, when one may read the natural compositions of the Creator, why on earth should one read the fabricated compositions of modern men?

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the marvel of using the subordinate to set off the principal. For example, before narrating the three sworn brothers of the Peach Garden, the text first narrates the three brothers of the Yellow Turbans: the Peach Garden brothers are the principal, the Yellow Turbans the subordinate. Before narrating the descendant of Prince Jing of Zhongshan, the text first narrates the descendant of Prince Gong of Lu: Prince Jing of Zhongshan is the principal, Prince Gong of Lu the subordinate. Before narrating He Jin, the text first narrates Chen Fan and Dou Wu: He Jin is the principal, Chen Fan and Dou Wu the subordinate. In recounting the outstanding qualities of Liu, Guan, and Zhang, and of Cao Cao and Sun Jian, the text also narrates the uselessness of the various lords of each region: Liu Bei, Cao Cao, and Sun Jian are the principal, the various regional lords the subordinate. Before Liu Bei is to meet Zhuge Liang, he first meets Sima Hui, Cui Zhouping, Shi Guangyuan, Meng Gongwei, and others: Zhuge Liang is the principal, Sima Hui and the others the subordinate. Zhuge Liang served two courts, yet there was also Xu Shu, who came early and left early, and Pang Tong, who came late but died first: Zhuge Liang is the principal, while Xu Shu and Pang Tong are again the subordinate. Zhao Yun first served Gongsun Zan; Huang Zhong first served Han玄; Ma Zhang first served Zhang Lu; Fa Zheng and Yan Yan first served Liu Zhang—yet all later submitted to Liu Bei: Liu Bei is the principal, Gongsun Zan, Han玄, Zhang Lu, and Liu Zhang the subordinate. Taishi Ci first served Liu Yao and later joined Sun Ce; Gan Ning first served Huang Zu and later joined Sun Quan; Zhang Lü first served Lü Bu; Xu Hang first served Yang Feng; Zhang He first served Yuan Shao; Jia Xu first served Li Jue and Zhang Xiu—yet all later submitted to Cao Cao: Sun and Cao are the principal, Liu Yao, Huang Zu, Lü Bu, Yang Feng, and the others the subordinate. The prophecy that he who would replace Han was the one on the road was fulfilled in Wei, yet Yuan Gonglu erroneously claimed it for himself: Wei is the principal, Yuan Gonglu the subordinate. The dream of three horses feeding from the same trough was fulfilled in the Sima clan, yet Cao Cao mistakenly believed it referred to Ma Teng and his sons: the Sima clan is the principal, Ma Teng and his sons the subordinate. As for the story of the abdication platform, Li Su used it to deceive Dong Zhuo, yet Cao Pi ascended the throne in truth, and Sima Yan too ascended the throne in truth: Cao Pi and Sima Yan are the principal, Dong Zhuo the subordinate. And it is not only persons who have principal and subordinate—places do as well. Emperor Xian moved from Luoyang to Chang'an, then from Chang'an back to Luoyang, and finally to Xuchang: Xuchang is the principal, Chang'an and Luoyang both the subordinate. Liu Bei lost Xuzhou but obtained Jingzhou: Jingzhou is the principal, Xuzhou the subordinate. When he gained the Two Sichuan Regions but lost Jingzhou: the Two Sichuan Regions are the principal, and Jingzhou is again the subordinate. Before Kongming was to campaign north against the Central Plains, he first pacified the southern barbarian regions—his intent lay not with the barbarian regions but with the Central Plains: the Central Plains are the principal, the barbarian regions the subordinate. Nor is it only places that have principal and subordinate—objects do as well. Li Ru presented poisoned wine, a short sword, and white silk to Emperor Bian: the poisoned wine is the principal, the short sword and white silk the subordinate. At the hunt at Xutian, before narrating Cao Cao shooting a deer, the text first narrates Xuande shooting a rabbit: the deer is the principal, the rabbit the subordinate. At the Battle of Red Cliff, before narrating Kongming borrowing the wind, the text first narrates Kongming borrowing arrows: the wind is the principal, the arrows the subordinate. Dong Cheng received a jade belt, accompanied by a brocade robe: the belt is the principal, the robe the subordinate. Lord Guan received the Red Hare Horse, accompanied by a golden seal, a red robe, and other gifts: the horse is the principal, the golden seal and the rest the subordinate. Cao Cao dug the ground and obtained a Bronze Sparrow, accompanied by a Jade Dragon and a Golden Phoenix: the sparrow is the principal, the dragon and phoenix the subordinate. Instances of this kind are too numerous to count. Those who are skilled at reading the book may, from these examples, apprehend the method of principal and subordinate in literary composition.

The novel *Three Kingdoms* possesses a remarkable quality: it is like a tree with different branches, branches with different leaves, leaves with different flowers, and flowers with different fruits. A skilled writer must be adept at avoidance, yet also adept at repetition. If one seeks to avoid without first repeating, no avoidance can be perceived; only by repeating and then avoiding does one's skill in avoidance become evident.

Consider the chronicling of the imperial harem: one writes of Empress He, and then of Empress Dong; of Empress Fu, and then of Empress Cao; of Noble Consort Tang, and then of Noble Lady Dong; of the two ladies Gan and Mi, and then of Lady Sun, and then of the Princess of Beidi; of Empress Zhen and Empress Mao of Wei, and then of Empress Zhang—yet not a single character among them is the same. In chronicling imperial in-laws, after He Jin comes Dong Cheng; after Dong Cheng comes Fu Wan; after Zhang Ji of Wei comes Qian Shang of Wu—yet again, not a single character is the same. In writing of powerful ministers, after Dong Zhuo come Li Jue and Guo Si; after Jue and Si comes Cao Cao; after Cao Cao comes Cao Pi; after Cao Pi comes Sima Yi; after Sima Yi come the brothers Shi and Zhao together; after Shi and Zhao comes Sima Yan, and alongside him Sun Chen of Wu—yet again, not a single character is the same.

When it comes to narrating affairs between brothers, Yuan Tan and Yuan Shang were at odds, Liu Qi and Liu琮 were at odds, and Cao Pi and Cao Zhi were likewise at odds—yet Tan and Shang both died, Qi and琮 one died and the other did not, while Pi and Zhi both survived. Is this not wonderfully different? In narrating matters of marriage, Dong Zhuo sought a marriage alliance with Sun Jian, Yuan Shu betrothed his daughter to Lü Bu, Cao Cao arranged a betrothal with Yuan Tan, Sun Quan gave his sister in marriage to Liu Bei and then sought a marriage alliance with Yunzhang—yet some were refused outright, some promised then broken, some feigned agreements that came to pass, and some genuine offers that were declined. Is this not wonderfully different?

Wang Yun employed the beauty stratagem, and Zhou Yu also employed the beauty stratagem—yet one succeeded and the other failed, making them different. Dong Zhuo and Lü Bu hated each other, and Li Jue and Guo Si hated each other—yet one conflict was resolved and the other was not, making them different. Emperor Xian issued two secret edicts—the first was concealed, the second was revealed. Ma Teng also launched two campaigns against the rebels—the first was open, the second was concealed. Herein lies their difference.

Lü Bu committed patricide twice: the first time motivated by wealth, the second by lust; the first time he sacrificed public duty for private gain, the second time he used public office to serve private ends. Herein lies another difference.

Zhao Yun rescued his lord twice: the first time on land, the second time on water; the first time he received the charge from the hands of the lord's mother, the second time he snatched the lord from the arms of the lord's mother. Herein lies yet another difference.

As for writing of water—it occurs more than once; writing of fire—it too occurs more than once. Cao Cao faced the waters of Xiapi and also the waters of Jizhou. Guan Yu encountered the waters of the Bai River and also the waters of Zengkou River. Lü Bu faced the fire at Puyang, Cao Cao the fire at Wuchao, Zhou Zhou the fire at Red Cliff, Lu Xun the fire at Xiaoting, Xu Sheng the fire at Nanxu, and Marquis Wu the fires at Bowang and Xintian, as well as the fires at Panshe Gu and Shangfang Gu. Has there been the slightest repetition among them all? Still more remarkably, Meng Huo was captured seven times, Qishan was campaigned against six times, and the Central Plains were invaded nine times—yet one cannot find a single repeated character among them. What sublime writing! It is like a tree that is always a tree, branches that are always branches, leaves that are always leaves, flowers that are always flowers—yet in sending down roots, setting buds, blooming, and bearing fruit, the five colors unfold in profusion, each forming its own distinct splendor.

From this, the reader may comprehend that in writing there is a method of avoidance, and also a method of repetition.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the wonder of shifting stars and turning constellations, of rain overturning and winds reversing. Du Fu's poem says: "Clouds in the sky are like white robes; in an instant they change into grey dogs." This speaks to the unpredictability of worldly affairs. The writing of *Three Kingdoms* is just the same. It begins with He Jin plotting to kill the eunuchs, yet ends up with the eunuchs killing He Jin—one transformation. It begins with Lü Bu assisting Ding Yuan, yet ends up with Lü Bu killing Ding Yuan—one transformation. It begins with Dong Zhuo befriending Lü Bu, yet ends up with Lü Bu killing Dong Zhuo—one transformation. It begins with Chen Gong releasing Cao Cao, yet ends up with Chen Gong wanting to kill Cao Cao—one transformation. Chen Gong fails to kill Cao Cao, and instead it turns out that Cao Cao kills Chen Gong—one transformation. It begins with Wang Yun refusing to pardon Guo Si and Li Jue, yet ends up with Guo Si and Li Jue killing Wang Yun—one transformation. It begins with Sun Jian and Yuan Shu being at odds, yet ends up with Yuan Shu sending a letter to Sun Jian—one transformation. It begins with Liu Biao seeking aid from Yuan Shao, yet ends up with Liu Biao killing Sun Jian—one transformation. It begins with the Liege following Yuan Shao to attack Dong Zhuo, yet ends up with him assisting Gongsun Zan to attack Yuan Shao—one transformation. It begins with the Liege rescuing Xuzhou, yet ends up with the Liege seizing Xuzhou—one transformation. It begins with Lü Bu going to Xuzhou, yet ends up with Lü Bu seizing Xuzhou—one transformation. It begins with Lü Bu attacking the Liege, yet ends up with Lü Bu welcoming the Liege—one transformation. It begins with Lü Bu breaking with Yuan Shu, and then it turns out that Lü Bu seeks help from Yuan Shu—one transformation. It begins with the Liege assisting Lü Bu to attack Yuan Shu, and then it turns out that he assists Cao Cao to kill Lü Bu—one transformation. It begins with the Liege assisting Cao Cao, and then it turns out that the Liege attacks Cao Cao—one transformation. It begins with the Liege attacking Yuan Shao, and then it turns out that the Liege joins Yuan Shao—one transformation. It begins with the Liege assisting Yuan Shao to attack Cao Cao, and then it turns out that Guan Yu assists Cao Cao to attack Yuan Shao—one transformation. It begins with Guan Yu seeking the Liege, and then it turns out that Zhang Fei wants to kill Guan Yu—one transformation. It begins with Guan Yu wanting to kill Cao Cao at Xutian, and then it turns out that Guan Yu releases Cao Cao at Huarong—one transformation. It begins with Cao Cao pursuing the Liege, and then it turns out that the Liege joins Eastern Wu to defeat Cao Cao—one transformation. It begins with Sun Quan being an enemy of Liu Biao, and then it turns out that Lu Su offers condolences at Liu Biao's funeral, and also at Liu Qi's—one transformation. It begins with Kongming assisting Zhou Yu, yet ends up with Zhou Yu wanting to kill Kongming—one transformation. It begins with Zhou Yu wanting to harm the Liege, yet ends up with Sun Quan giving his sister in marriage to the Liege—one transformation. It begins with using Lady Sun to restrain the Liege, yet ends up with Lady Sun assisting the Liege—one transformation. It begins with Kongming angering Zhou Yu to death, and then it turns out that Kongming mourns Zhou Yu—one transformation. It begins with the Liege not accepting Liu Biao's Jing Province, yet ends up with the Liege borrowing Jing Province—one transformation. It begins with Liu Zhang wanting to ally with Cao Cao, yet ends up with him welcoming the Liege—one transformation. It begins with Liu Zhang welcoming the Liege, yet ends up with the Liege seizing Liu Zhang's territory—one transformation. It begins with the Liege dividing Jing Province, and then it turns out that Lü Meng seizes Jing Province—one transformation. It begins with the Liege defeating Eastern Wu, and then it turns out that Lu Xun defeats the Liege—one transformation. It begins with Sun Quan seeking aid from Cao Pi, yet ends up with Cao Pi wanting to attack Sun Quan—one transformation. It begins with the Liege being an enemy of Eastern Wu, and then it turns out that Kongming makes peace with Eastern Wu—one transformation. It begins with Feng Feng listening to Meng Da, yet ends up with Liu Feng attacking Meng Da—one transformation. It begins with Meng Da betraying the Liege, and then it turns out that Meng Da wants to return to Kongming—one transformation. It begins with Ma Teng working alongside the Liege, and then it turns out that Ma Chao attacks the Liege—one transformation. It begins with Ma Chao aiding Liu Zhang, yet ends up with Ma Chao joining the Liege—one transformation. It begins with Jiang Wei opposing Kongming, yet ends up with Jiang Wei assisting Kongming—one transformation. It begins with Xiahou Ba assisting Sima Yi, yet ends up with Xiahou Ba assisting Jiang Wei—one transformation. It begins with Zhong Hui being jealous of Deng Ai, yet ends up with Wei Guan killing Deng Ai—one transformation. It begins with Jiang Wei tricking Zhong Hui, yet ends up with the generals killing Zhong Hui—one transformation. It begins with Yang Hu and Lu Kang being on friendly terms, yet ends up with Yang Hu requesting to attack Sun Hao—one transformation. It begins with Yang Hu requesting to attack Wu, and then it brings forth a Du Yu, and then a Wang Jun—one transformation. In terms of its method of foreshadowing, reading the earlier volumes, one is certain to know what the later volumes hold; in terms of its boundless transformations, reading the earlier passages, one never anticipates what the later passages will bring. In what can be foreseen, one sees the refinement of *Three Kingdoms*' writing; in what cannot be foretold, one sees even more the phantasmagoria of *Three Kingdoms*' writing.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the wonder of horizontal clouds cutting through ridges and horizontal bridges locking streams. In writing, there are passages that should be connected and passages that should be severed. Such as slaying six generals through five passes, three visits to the thatched cottage, and seven captures of Meng Huo—these are passages that excel in connection. Such as three angers to Zhou Yu, six expeditions from Qishan, and nine campaigns against the Central Plains—these are passages that excel in severance. For when a passage is short, narrating it without connection leaves it incoherent; when a passage is long, narrating it connected risks making it tedious. Therefore, it is necessary to narrate other matters to intersperse it, so that the literary force becomes intricately varied and fully transformed. Later generations of popular fiction writers have rarely been able to match this.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the wonder of seeing sleet before snow and hearing thunder before rain. When there is to be a major passage later, there must first be a minor passage to serve as its introduction. When there is to be a grand passage later, there must first be a smaller passage to serve as its beginning. For example, before narrating the fire at Puyang involving Cao Cao, a minor passage about the fire at the home of Mi Zhu is written to introduce it; before narrating Kong Rong seeking aid from the Liege, a minor passage about Kong Rong assassinating Li Hong is written to introduce it; before narrating the grand passage of the fire at Red Cliffs, two smaller passages about Bowang and Xinye are written to introduce it; before narrating the grand passage of the six expeditions from Qishan, the smaller passage of the seven captures of Meng Huo is written to introduce it. When the people of Lu were to perform a great sacrifice to God, they would first perform a sacrifice at the Pangong. The wonder of literary writing is precisely of this kind.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of ripples following waves and gentle rain after a downpour. Where writing is truly remarkable, there must be foreshadowing before the event and lingering momentum after it. Thus, after Dong Zhuo, rebel followers arise to continue the tale; after the Yellow Turban Rebellion, surviving partisans carry the story forward; after Liu Bei's three visits to the thatched cottage, there follows the episode of Liu Qi's three requests to Zhuge Liang as a mirrored accompaniment; and after the great narrative of Zhuge Liang's northern campaigns, there follows the episode of Jiang Wei's expeditions against Wei as a rippling continuation. All such instances are found in no other work.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of ice dispelling heat and a cool breeze sweeping away dust. For example, when Lord Guan is slashing his way through five passes, suddenly there appears the passage of meeting Elder Pu Jing at Zhenguo Temple; when Liu Bei leaps his horse across the Tan Stream, suddenly there appears the episode of meeting Master Sima at Shuijing Manor; when Sun Ce has established himself like a tiger east of the Yangtze, suddenly there appears the episode of encountering Yu Ji; when Cao Cao receives the title of King of Wei, suddenly there appears the episode of encountering Zuo Ci; when Liu Bei makes his three visits to the thatched cottage, suddenly there appears the episode of encountering Cui Zhouping sitting on the ground in leisurely conversation; after Lord Guan has flooded the seven armies, suddenly there appears the episode of spiritual enlightenment beneath the moon at Yuquan Mountain. And then, when Zhuge Liang campaigns against the southern barbarians, he unexpectedly encounters Meng Jie; when Lu Xun pursues the Shu forces, he unexpectedly encounters Huang Chengyan; when Zhang Ren faces the enemy, he unexpectedly meets the Purple Void Elder; when Liu Bei wages war on Wu, he unexpectedly inquires of the old man of Qingcheng—now a monk, now a Taoist, now a recluse, now a man of superior insight—all sought amid the utmost clamor, truly enough to settle the restless mind and cleanse the troubled heart.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of reed pipes accompanying drums and zithers interspersed with bells. Thus, in the midst of narrating the Yellow Turbans' upheaval, suddenly there appears the passage of the two empresses, Empress He and Empress Dong, arguing at court; in the midst of narrating Dong Zhuo's domineering career, suddenly there appears the episode of Diaochan at Phoenix Pavilion; in the midst of narrating the rampages of Li Jue and Guo Si, suddenly there appears the episode of Yang Biao's wife visiting Guo Si's wife; in the midst of narrating the battle for Xiapi, suddenly there appears the episode of Lü Bu sending off his wife and Lady Yan pining for her husband; in the midst of narrating the carnage in Jizhou, suddenly there appears the episode of Yuan Tan losing his wife and Cao Pi taking a bride; in the midst of narrating the upheaval in Jingzhou, suddenly there appears the episode of Lady Cai's deliberations; in the midst of narrating the fierce battle at Red Cliff, suddenly there appears the episode of Cao Cao desiring to seize the two Qiaos; in the midst of narrating the assault on Wancheng, suddenly there appears the episode of Zhang Ji's wife encountering Cao Cao; in the midst of narrating Zhao Yun's capture of Guiyang, suddenly there appears the episode of Zhao Fan's widowed sister-in-law offering wine; in the midst of narrating Liu Bei's struggle for Jingzhou, suddenly there appears the episode of Sun Quan's sister in the bridal chamber; in the midst of narrating Sun Quan's campaign against Huang Zu, suddenly there appears the episode of Sun Yi's wife avenging her husband; in the midst of narrating Sima Yi's execution of Cao Shuang, suddenly there appears the episode of Xian Xianying devising strategy for her younger brother. And then, when Yuan Shao attacks Cao Cao, the narrative suddenly includes the episode of Zheng Kangcheng's maid; when Cao Cao relieves the Hanzhong front, the narrative suddenly includes the episode of Cai Zhonglang's daughter. Instances of this kind are too numerous to count. People know only that the writing of *Three Kingdoms* narrates matters of dragon-versus-tiger contention, but they do not realize that it also presents phoenixes and luan-birds, orioles and swallows—so many that one can barely take them all in. It makes one encounter red skirts even amid ranks of spears and halberds, and glimpse powdered faces even among the shadows of banners and pennants. It is as though a chronicle of bold warriors and a chronicle of beautiful women have been combined into a single book.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of sowing seeds a year ahead and planting foreshadowing long in advance. A skilled gardener casts seeds upon the ground and waits for the proper season to bring them forth; a skilled chess player places a seemingly idle move dozens of turns ahead, and its effect appears dozens of turns later. The method of narrative in literature is no different. Thus, Liu Zhang of Western Shu is the son of Liu Yan, yet before narrating Liu Bei in the first chapter, Liu Yan is narrated first—early planting a seed for the later seizure of Western Shu. Again, when Xuande defeats the Yellow Turbans, Cao Cao is narrated alongside and Dong Zhuo is mentioned in passing—early planting seeds for Dong Zhuo's disruption of the state and Cao Cao's usurpation of power. Zhao Yun joins Xuande at the gathering at Gucheng, but Xuande's meeting with Zhao Yun was foreshadowed earlier, at the Battle of the Pan River against Gongsun Zan. Ma Chao joins Xuande after the clash with Zhang Fei at Jiameng, but Xuande's association with Ma Teng was foreshadowed earlier, when they jointly received the secret edict in the sash. Pang Tong joins Xuande after Zhou Yu's death, but the boy's mention of Pang Tong's name was foreshadowed earlier, before Shuijing Manor. Zhuge Liang's sigh of "Man proposes, God disposes" comes after the fire at Shangfang Valley, but Sima Hui's remark that "the time has not yet come" and Cui Zhouping's words that "Heaven cannot be defied" were foreshadowed earlier, before the three visits to the thatched cottage. Liu Shan ruled Shu for over forty years before the end, which comes after chapter one hundred and ten, but the omen of the crane's cry was foreshadowed earlier, at Liu Shan's birth in Xinye. Jiang Wei's nine campaigns against the Central Plains come after chapter one hundred and five, but Zhuge Liang's recruitment of Jiang Wei was foreshadowed earlier, at the first expedition out of Qishan. Jiang Wei's encounter with Deng Ai comes after the third campaign against the Central Plains; Jiang Wei's encounter with Zhong Hui comes after the ninth campaign; but Xiahou Ba's naming of both men was foreshadowed earlier, before any campaign against the Central Plains had begun. Cao Pi's usurpation of the Han occurs around chapter eighty, but the auspicious sign of blue and purple clouds was foreshadowed earlier, before chapter thirty-three. Sun Ce's assumption of the imperial title occurs after chapter eighty-five, but Lady Wu's dream of the sun was foreshadowed earlier, in chapter thirty-eight. Sima's usurpation of Wei occurs in chapter one hundred and nineteen, but Cao Cao's dream of the horses was foreshadowed earlier, in chapter fifty-seven. Beyond these, the instances of foreshadowing are too numerous to count. One often sees that in recent times, when vernacular novelists reach a point where they are at a loss to carry the narrative forward, they conjure up a person from thin air and invent an event out of nothing, so that the later portion is cut off from the earlier portion and bears no relation to it. Let such a person try reading the writing of *Three Kingdoms* and see if he does not blush with shame!

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of adding silk to brocade and evening out stitches with even needlework. In the method of narration, what is lacking in this chapter is supplied in that chapter; what is excessive in the upper scroll is distributed into the lower scroll. This not only prevents the earlier writing from becoming tedious, but also keeps the later writing from feeling sparse; it not only ensures that no prior events are left out, but also enhances the rendering of later events: this is indeed a masterpiece of historiographical craft. For example, Lü Bu's taking of Cao Bao's daughter, which originally occurred before the seizure of Xuzhou, is recounted instead during the siege of Xiapi; Cao Cao's "plugging at plums to quench thirst," which originally occurred during the campaign against Zhang Xiu, is recounted instead during the green plum and wine drinking; Guan Ning's cutting of the mat to sit apart, which originally occurred before Hua Xin took office, is recounted instead during the breaking of the wall to retrieve the empress; Lady Wu's dream of the moon, which originally occurred before the birth of Sun Ce, is recounted instead during her deathbed behest; and Marquis Wu's seeking of a wife from the Huang family, which originally occurred before emerging from the thatched cottage, is recounted instead during the martyrdom ofuge Zhan. Instances of this kind are too numerous to count. The earlier sections leave room to answer for the later, and the later sections reflect back to answer for the earlier—so that reading it, one truly finds an entire work reading like a single sentence.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of dark, heavy strokes for nearby mountains and light, faint outlines for distant trees. In the painter's craft, mountains and trees that are near are rendered dark and heavy; mountains and trees that are distant are rendered light and faint. Were it otherwise—with forests stretching far and mountain mist layered upon layer—how could everything be meticulously depicted within the span of a single scroll? Writing is precisely the same. For example, Huangfu Song's defeat of the Yellow Turbans is learned entirely through inquiries on the side of Zhu Jun; Yuan Shao's killing of Gongsun Zan is learned entirely through inquiries on the side of Cao Cao; Zhao Yun's capture of Nan Commandery and Guan Yu and Zhang Fei's capture of the two commanderies are learned entirely through Zhou Yu's eyes and ears; Liu Bei's killing of Yang Feng and Han Xian is narrated entirely through Liu Bei's own words; Zhang Fei's seizure of the old city is heard entirely through Guan Yu's ears; Jian Yong's going over to Yuan Shao is spoken entirely through Liu Bei's words. As for Cao Pi's three-pronged attack on Wu, all of which ended in defeat—one route is written in full detail, while the two others are written with deliberate brevity; and when Marquis Wu repelled Cao Pi's five-pronged army, only the dispatch of an envoy to Wu is written in full detail, while the other four routes are written with deliberate brevity. Instances of this kind are likewise too numerous to count. A mere sentence or two—one hardly knows how many events it encompasses, how many brushstrokes it economizes.

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses the exquisite art of strange peaks facing each other and embroidered screens standing in opposition. Its methods of pairing include direct contrasts, inverse contrasts, contrasts made within a single scroll, and contrasts spanning dozens of scrolls in distant echo. For example: Liu Bei was great from childhood, while Cao Cao was treacherous from childhood. Zhang Fei was impetuous through and through, while He Jin was slow-witted through and through. The discussion at Wenming Hall showed Dong Zhuo's lack of loyalty to his sovereign; the killing of Ding Yuan showed Lü Bu's lack of filial piety to his father. At the Battle of Pan River, Yuan Shao's fortunes shifted between victory and defeat unpredictably; at the campaign on Mount Xian, Sun Jian's fate between life and death hung in the balance. Ma Teng served the royal house without success, yet his loyalty remained unimpeachable; Cao Cao avenged his father without completing the deed, and so could not be called filial. Yuan Shao raised three armies of horse and foot only only to withdraw—he had the strength to fight but lacked the resolve to decide; Liu Bei captured the two generals Wang and Liu only to release them—his position was too weak, so he yielded to expedience. Kong Rong recommended Mi Heng—this was the affection praised in the "Black Robes"; Mi Heng reviled Cao Cao—this was the resentment of the "Lane Elder." Liu Bei's meeting with De Cao was an encounter by chance; Shan Fu's passing through Xinyang was a visit by design. Cao Pi bitterly pressed the life out of Cao Zhi—brothers became enemies; Liu Bei wept bitterly over Guan Yu's death—men of different surnames were as flesh and bone. The fire was extinguished at Shangfang Valley—Sima's fate was to live; the lamp went out at Wuzhang Yuan—Zhuge Liang's fate was to die. Instances of this kind—whether direct contrasts or inverse contrasts—are all pairings that occur within a single chapter. As for those who harm their own in-laws through in-laws: there is He Jin. As for those who recommend their own in-laws through in-laws: there is Fu Wan. Li Su persuaded Lü Bu—using cunning to abet his evil; Wang Yun persuaded Lü Bu—using skill to advance his loyalty. Zhang Fei lost Xuzhou—through the fault of drinking; Lü Bu fell at Xiapi—through the calamity of banning wine. Guan Yu drank Lu Su's wine—it was an expression of divine awe; Yang Hu drank Lu Kang's wine—it was an expression of harmonious spirit. Zhuge Liang did not kill Meng Huo—this was the magnanimity of the benevolent; Sima Yi would not spare Gongsun Yuan—this was the harshness of the treacherous hero. Guan Yu released Cao Cao on grounds of honor—repaying a debt received before; Zhang Fei released Yan Yan on grounds of honor—winning his service for later. Zhuge Liang did not use the Ziwu Valley plan—he deliberated carefully to ensure complete success; Deng Ai did not fear the peril of Yinping Ridge—he courted danger in pursuit of fortune. Cao Cao was ill, and a single scolding from Chen Lin cured him; Wang Lang was well, and a single scolding from Zhuge Liang killed him. Lady Sun delighted in arms and armor—a woman among women; Sima Yi accepted the headscarf and skirt—a woman among men. Taking Shangyong in eight days—swiftness made it miraculous; taking Xiangping in a hundred days—slowness brought victory. Zhuge Liang tilled the fields at Weibin—it was the main stratagem for advance; Jiang Wei tilled the fields at Dazhong—it was the plan for retreat. Cao Cao received the Nine Distinctions from Han—this was Cao's lack of submission as a subject; Sun Quan received the Nine Distinctions from Wei—this was Quan's lack of sovereignty as a ruler. Cao Cao shot at a deer—his conduct violated the bond between sovereign and minister; Cao Pi shot at a deer—his feelings stirred the bond between mother and son. Yang Yi and Wei Yan contended with each other on the day of the army's withdrawal; Deng Ai and Zhong Hui suspected each other at the time of military operations. Jiang Wei sought to carry on Zhuge Liang's ambition—but human effort ran counter to Heaven's will; Du Yu was able to inherit Yang Hu's strategy—and Heaven's timing answered to human effort. Instances of this kind—whether direct contrasts or inverse contrasts—are all pairings that do not occur within a single chapter but echo each other from afar. If one truly measures and compares them here, would it not be enough to delight the heart of those who read the ancients and broaden the knowledge of those who delight in evaluating the past!

The *Three Kingdoms* possesses major correspondences between its beginning and end, and pivotal linkages throughout its middle. For example, the first chapter opens with the Ten Regular Attendants [eunuchs], and the final chapter concludes with Liu Shan's favoring of the palace eunuchs, while also doubling the correspondence with Sun Hao's favoring of the palace eunuchs—this is one major correspondence. Likewise, the first chapter opens with the sorcery of the Yellow Turbans, and the final chapter concludes with Liu Shan's belief in a sorceress, while also doubling the correspondence with Sun Hao's belief in a sorceress—this is another major correspondence. Since the correspondences lie at the beginning and end, if within the hundred-odd chapters between them there were nothing that connected with the preceding and following portions, the compositional method would be incomplete. Therefore, there is Fu Wan entrusting a eunuch with a letter, and Sun Liang detecting a eunuch stealing honey, which serve to link the preceding and following portions. There are also Li Jue's delight in a sorceress, and Zhang Lu's employment of heterodox arts, which serve to link the preceding and following portions. All such instances are divinely wrought, serving to perfect the structure of the entire work. Yet this is not all. The author's intention extends beyond eunuchs and sorcery to a stern emphasis on punishing rebellious ministers and villainous sons, in order to align himself with the principles of the *Spring and Autumn Annals*. Hence the book repeatedly records the loyalty of those who punish rebels and chronicles the evil of those who murder their sovereigns. At the end of the first chapter, it concludes with Zhang Fei's furious desire to kill Dong Zhuo. At the end of the final chapter, it concludes with Sun Hao's concealed desire to kill Jia Chong. Viewed in this light, though it is called a "popularized history," it may well stand alongside the Unicorn Classic [the *Spring and Autumn Annals*] without shame.

The narrative excellence of *Three Kingdoms* is truly comparable to that of the *Records of the Grand Historian*; yet the difficulty of its narrative is several times greater than that of the *Records*. In the *Records*, each state is treated separately and each person recorded separately, hence the distinction between Basic Annals, Hereditary Houses, and Biographies. In *Three Kingdoms*, however, it is as though the Basic Annals, Hereditary Houses, and Biographies are merged into a single composition. When divided, the writing is short and easier to execute; when combined, the writing is long and harder to do well.

Reading *Three Kingdoms* surpasses reading the *Chronicles of the States*. Now the *Zuo Commentary* and the *Discourses of the States* are indeed among the finest works of literature. However, Master Zuo composed his commentary in reliance on the Classic, and since the Classic forms self-contained passages section by section, so too does the commentary form self-contained passages section by section, without connecting them. The *Discourses of the States*, being independent of the Classic, forms its own book and could have connected its passages; yet in the end the *Discourses of Zhou*, *Lu*, *Jin*, *Zheng*, *Qi*, *Chu*, *Wu*, and *Yue*—eight states divided into eight sections—are likewise not connected with one another. Later generations combined the *Zuo Commentary* and the *Discourses of the States* into the *Chronicles of the States*; but because the states were numerous and events complex, the passages ultimately could not be strung together. Now the *Romance of the Three Kingdoms*, read from first chapter to last, has no single place where it could be broken off. This book therefore stands above the *Chronicles of the States*.

Reading *Three Kingdoms* surpasses reading *Journey to the West*. *Journey to the West* fabricates matters of demons and monsters—absurd and contrary to reason. It is not like *Three Kingdoms*, which faithfully records matters of emperors and kings, genuine and verifiable. Moreover, whatever merits *Journey to the West* possesses, *Three Kingdoms* already has them all. Instances such as the Mute Spring and the Black Spring are no different in marvel from the Child-Mother River and the Miscarriage Spring. Figures such as King Duosi and King Lumu are no different in their appellations from the Ox Demon, Deer-Strength, Gold-Horn, and Silver-Horn. Instances such as the Marquis of Fubo manifesting his spirit and the Mountain Spirit giving guidance are no different from the saving grace of Guanyin of the Southern Sea. A single volume, the *Record of the Han Chancellor's Southern Expedition*, is worth an entire *Journey to the West*. As for the Temple Protecting the State in the earlier part and the Jade Spring Mountain in the latter part—where in one a gaze upon a precept knife delivers one from the calamity of fire, and in another a single utterance toward the void is like a staff-stroke shout—must one recite the texts of "Spiritual Platform, Square Inch" and "Slanting Dipper, Three Stars" before one can awaken to the mind of Zen?

Reading *Three Kingdoms* surpasses reading *Water Margin*. The authenticity of *Water Margin*'s writing, though superior to the fantasy of *Journey to the West*, yet its creations out of nothing and its arbitrary beginnings and endings—its ingenuity is not difficult. In the end, it cannot match *Three Kingdoms*, which narrates fixed events that cannot be altered, yet still achieves ingenuity—that is the true difficulty. Moreover, the abundance of talent in the Three Kingdoms period is portrayed, each figure excelling in his own way, and there are those who tower ten thousand times above Wu Yong, Gongsun Sheng, and the rest. I say that among the ranks of "books of genius," the *Romance of the Three Kingdoms* should be ranked first.

◀Previous Chapter

Next Chapter▶

*Romance of the Three Kingdoms*

讀《三國志》法

讀三國志法

  讀《三國志》者,當知有正統、閏運、僭國之別。正統者何?蜀漢是也。僭國者何?吳、魏是也。閏運者何?晉是也。魏之不得為正統者,何也?論地則以中原為主,論理則以劉氏為主。論地不若論理,故以正統予魏者,司馬光《通鑑》之誤也。以正統予蜀者,紫陽《綱目》之所以為正也。《綱目》于獻帝建安之末,大書「後漢昭烈皇帝章武元年」,而以吳、魏分注其下。蓋以蜀為帝室之胄,在所當予:魏為篡國之賊,在所當奪。是以前則書「劉備起兵徐州討曹操」,後則書「漢丞相諸葛亮出師伐魏」,而大義昭然揭于千古矣。夫劉氏未亡,魏未混一,魏固不得為正統;迨乎劉氏已亡,晉已混一,而晉亦不得為正統者。何也?曰:晉以臣弑君,與魏無異,而一傳之後,厥祚不長,但可謂之閏運,而不可謂之正統也。至於東晉偏安,以牛易馬,愈不得以正統歸之。故三國之并吞于晉,猶六國之混一于秦,五代之混一于隋耳。秦不過為漢驅除,隋不過為唐驅除。前之正統,以漢為主,而秦與魏、晉不得與焉;亦猶後之正統,以唐宋為主,而宋、齊、梁、陳、隋、梁、唐、晉、漢、周俱不得與焉耳。且不特魏、晉不如漢之為正,即唐、宋亦不如漢之為正。煬帝無道,而唐代之,是已惜其不能顯然如周之代商;而稱唐公,加九錫,以蹈魏晉之陋轍,則得天下之正不如漢也。若夫宋以忠厚立國,又多名臣大儒出乎其間,故尚論者以正統予宋。然終宋之世,燕雲十六州未入版圖,其規模已遜于唐;而陳橋兵變,黃袍加身,取天下於孤兒寡婦之手,則得天下之正亦不如漢也。唐、宋且不如漢,而何論魏、晉哉?高帝以除暴秦、擊楚之殺義帝者而興,光武以誅王莽而克復舊物,昭烈以討曹操而存漢祀於西川。祖宗之創之者正,而子孫之繼之者亦正,不得但以光武之混一為正統,而謂昭烈之偏安非正統也。昭烈為正統,而劉裕、劉知遠亦皆劉氏子孫,其不得為正統者,何也?曰:裕與知遠之為漢苗裔,遠而無徵,不若中山靖王之後,近而可考。又二劉皆以篡弑得國,故不得與昭烈並也。後唐李存勗之不得為正統者,何也?曰:存勗本非李而賜姓李,其與呂秦、牛晉不甚相遠,故亦不得與昭烈並也。南唐李昪之亦不得繼唐而為正統者,何也?曰:世遠代遐,亦裕與知遠者比,故亦不得與昭烈並也。南唐李昇不得繼唐而為正統,南宋高宗獨得繼宋而為正統者,何也?高宗立太祖之後為後,以延宋祚于不絕,故正統歸焉。夫以高宗之殺岳飛、用秦檜,全不以二聖為念,作史者尚以其延宋祚而歸之以正統,況昭烈之君臣同心、誓討漢賊者乎?則昭烈之為正統,愈無疑也。陳壽之《志》未及辨此,余故折衷于紫陽《綱目》,而特于演義中附正之。

  古史甚多,而人獨貪看《三國志》者,以古今人才之聚,未有盛于三國者也。觀才與不才敵不奇,觀才與才敵則奇;觀才與才敵,而一才又遇眾才之匹不奇,觀才與才敵,而眾才尤讓一才之勝則更奇。吾以為《三國》有三奇,可稱三絕:諸葛孔明一絕也,關雲長一絕也,曹操亦一絕也。歷稽載籍,賢相林立,而名高萬古者,莫如孔明。其處而彈琴抱膝,居然隱士風流;出而羽扇綸巾,不改雅度。在草廬之中,而識三分天下,則達乎天時;承顧命之重,而至六出祁山,則盡乎人事。七擒八陣,木牛流馬,既已疑鬼疑神之不測;鞠躬盡瘁,志決身殲,仍是為臣為子之用心。比管樂則過之,比伊呂則兼之,是古今來賢相中第一奇人。歷稽載籍,名將如雲,而絕倫超群者,莫如雲長。青史對青燈,則極其儒雅;赤心如赤面,則極其英靈。秉燭達旦,人傳其大節;單刀赴會,世服其神威。獨行千里,報主之志堅;義釋華容,酬恩之誼重。作事如青天白日,待人如霽月光風。心則趙抃焚香告帝之心,而磊落過之;意則阮籍白眼傲物之意,而嚴正過之:是古今來名將中第一奇人。歷稽載籍,奸雄接踵,而智足以攬人才而欺天下者,莫如曹操。聽荀彧勤王之說,而自比周文,則有似乎忠;黜袁術僭號之非,而願為曹侯,則有似乎順;不殺陳琳而愛其才,則有似乎寬;不追關公以全其志,則有似乎義。王敦不能用郭璞,而操之得士過之;桓溫不能識王猛,而操之知人過之。李林甫雖能制祿山,不如操之擊烏桓于塞外;韓侂胄雖能貶秦檜,不若操之討董卓於生前。竊國家之柄而姑存其號,異于王莽之顯然弑君;留改革之事以俟其兒,勝于劉裕之急欲篡晉:是古今來奸雄中第一奇人。有此三奇,乃前後史之所絕無者。故讀遍諸史,而愈不得不喜讀《三國志》也。

  三國之有三絕,固已。然吾自三絕而外,更遍觀乎三國之前、三國之後,問有運籌帷幄,如徐庶、龐統者乎?問有行軍用兵,如周瑜、陸遜、司馬懿者乎?問有料人料事,如郭嘉、程昱、荀彧、賈詡、步騭、虞翻、顧雍、張昭者乎?問有武功將略邁等越倫,如張飛、趙雲、黃忠、嚴顏、張遼、徐晃、徐盛、朱桓者乎?問有衝鋒陷陣驍銳莫當,如馬超、馬岱、關興、張苞、許褚、典韋、張郃、夏侯惇、黃蓋、周泰、甘寧、太史慈、丁奉者乎?問有兩才相當、兩賢相遇,如姜維、鄧艾之智勇悉敵,羊祜、陸抗之從容互鎮者乎?至于道學則馬融、鄭玄,文藻則蔡邕、王粲,穎捷則曹植、楊修,蚤慧則諸葛恪、鍾會,應對則秦宓、張松,舌辯則李恢、闞澤,不辱君命則趙諮、鄧芝,飛書馳檄則陳琳、阮瑀,治煩理劇則蔣琬、董允,揚譽蜚聲則馬良、荀爽,好古則杜預,博物則張華,求之別籍,俱未易一一見也。乃若知賢則有司馬徽之哲,勵操則有管寧之高,隱居則有崔州平、石廣元、孟公威之逸,忤姦則有孔融之正,觸邪則有趙彥之直,斥惡則有禰衡之豪,罵賊則有吉平之壯,殉國則有董承、伏完之賢,捐生則有耿紀、韋晃之節。子死于父,則有劉諶、關平之孝;臣死于君,則有諸葛瞻、諸葛尚之忠;部曲死於主帥,則有趙累、周倉之義。其他早計如田豐,苦口如王累,矢貞如沮授,不屈如張任,輕財篤友如魯肅,事主不二心如諸葛瑾,不畏強禦如陳泰,視死如歸如王經,獨存介性如司馬孚,炳炳燐燐,照耀史冊。殆舉前之豐沛三傑、商山四皓、雲臺諸將、富春客星,後之瀛洲學士、麟閣功臣、杯酒節度、柴市宰相,分見於各朝之千百年者,奔合輜湊于三國之一時,豈非人才一大都會哉!入鄧林而選名材,游玄圃而見積玉,收不勝收,接不暇接,吾于《三國》有觀止之嘆矣。

  《三國》一書,乃文章之最妙者。敘三國,不自三國始也,三國必有所自始,則始之以漢帝。敘三國,不自三國終也,三國必有所言終,則終之以晉國。而不但此也,劉備以帝胄而纘統,則有宗室如劉表、劉璋、劉繇、劉辟等以陪之;曹操以強臣而專制,則有廢立如董卓,亂國如李傕、郭汜以陪之。孫權以方侯而分鼎,則有僭號如袁術,稱雄如袁紹,割據如呂布、公孫瓚、張楊、張邈、張魯、張繡等以陪之。劉備、曹操,于第一回出名,而孫權則於第七回方出名。曹氏之定許都,在第十一回;孫氏之定江東,在第十二回;而劉氏之取西川,則在第六十回後。假令今人作稗官,欲平空擬一《三國》之事,勢必劈頭便敘三人,三人便各據一國,有能如是之統乎其前、出乎其後,多方以盤旋乎其左右者哉?古事所傳,天然有此等波瀾,天然有此等層折,以成絕世妙文。然則讀《三國》一書,誠勝讀稗官萬萬耳。

  若論三國開基之主,人盡知為劉備、孫權、曹操也,而不知其間各有不同。備與操皆自我身而創業,而孫權則籍父兄之力,其不同者一。備與權皆及身而為帝,而操則不自為而待之于其子孫,其不同者二。三國之稱帝也,惟魏獨早,而蜀則稱帝於曹操已死、曹丕已立之餘,吳則稱帝於劉備已死、劉禪已立之後,其不同者三。三國之相持也,吳為蜀之鄰,魏為蜀之讐;蜀與吳有和有戰,而蜀與魏則有戰無和;吳與蜀則和多于戰,吳與魏則戰多于和,其不同者四。三國之傳也,蜀止二世,魏則自丕及奐凡五主,吳則自權及皓凡四主,其不同者五。三國之亡也,吳居其後,而蜀先之,魏次之。魏則見奪于其臣,吳、蜀則見并于其敵,其不同者六。不寧惟是,策之與權,則兄終而弟及;丕之與植,則舍弟而立兄;備之與禪,則父為帝而子為虜;操之與丕,則父為臣而子為君:可謂參差錯落,變化無方者矣。今之不善畫者,雖使繪兩人,亦必彼此同貌。今之不善歌者,即使唱兩調,亦必前後同聲。文之合掌,往往類是。古人本無雷同之事,而今人好為雷同之文。則何不取余所批《三國志》而讀之?

  《三國》一書,總起總結之中,又有六起六結。其敘獻帝,則以董卓廢立為一起,以曹丕篡奪為一結;其敘西蜀,則以成都稱帝為一起,而以綿竹出降為一結;其敘劉、關、張三人,則以桃園結義為一起,而以白帝託孤為一結。其敘諸葛亮,則以三顧草廬為一起,而以六出祁山為一結;其敘魏國,則以黃初改元為一起,而以司馬受禪為一結;其敘東吳,則以孫堅匿璽為一起,而以孫皓銜璧為一結。凡此數段文字,聯絡交互于其間,或此方起而彼已結,或此未結而彼又起。讀之不見其斷續之跡,而按之則自有章法之可知也。

  《三國》一書,有追本窮源之妙。三國之分,由于諸鎮之角立。諸鎮角立,由于董卓之亂國。董卓亂國,由于何進之召外兵。何進召外兵,由于十常侍之專政。故敘三國,必以十常侍為之端也。然而劉備之初起,不即在諸鎮之內,而尚在草澤之間。夫草澤之所以有英雄聚義,而諸鎮之所以繕修兵革者,由于黃巾之作亂。故敘三國,又必以黃巾為之端也。乃黃巾未作,則有上天垂災異以警戒之,更有忠謀智計之士直言極諫以預料之。使當時為之君者,體天心之仁愛,納良臣之讜論,斷然舉十常侍而迸斥焉,則黃巾可以不作,草澤英雄可以不起,諸鎮之兵革可以不修,而三國可以不分矣。故敘三國而追本於桓、靈,猶河源之有星宿海云。

  《三國》一書,有巧收幻結之妙。設令魏而為蜀所并,此人心之所甚願也。設令蜀亡而魏得一統,此人心之所大不平也。乃彼蒼之意,不從人心所甚願,而亦不出于人心之所大不平,特假手于晉以一之,此造物者之幻也。然天既不祚漢,又不予魏,則何不假手于吳,而必假手于晉乎?曰:魏固漢賊也,吳嘗害關公,奪荊州,助魏以攻蜀,則亦漢賊也。若晉之奪魏,有似乎為漢報讐也者,則與其一之以吳,無寧一之以晉也。且吳為魏敵,而晉為魏臣;魏以臣弑君,而晉即如其事以報之,可以為戒于天下後世,則使魏而見并于其敵,不若使之見并于其臣之為快也,是造物者之巧也。幻既出人意外,巧復在人意中,造物者可謂善於作文矣。今人下筆,必不能如此之幻、如此之巧,然則讀造物自然之文,而又何必讀今人臆造之文乎哉!

  《三國》一書,有以賓襯主之妙。如將敘桃園兄弟三人,先敘黃巾兄弟三人:桃園其主也,黃巾其賓也。將敘中山靖王之後,先敘魯恭王之後:中山靖王其主也,魯恭王其賓也。將敘何進,先敘陳蕃、竇武:何進其主也,陳蕃、竇武其賓也。敘劉、關、張及曹操、孫堅之出色,并敘各鎮諸侯之無用:劉備、曹操、孫堅其主也,各鎮諸侯其賓也。劉備將遇諸葛亮,而先遇司馬徽、崔州平、石廣元、孟公威等諸人:諸葛亮其主也,司馬徽諸人其賓也。諸葛亮歷事兩朝,乃又有先來即去之徐庶、晚來先死之龐統:諸葛亮其主也,而徐庶、龐統又其賓也。趙雲先事公孫瓚,黃忠先事韓玄,馬超先事張魯,法正、嚴顏先事劉璋,而後皆歸劉備:備其主也,公孫瓚、韓玄、張魯、劉璋其賓也。太史慈先事劉繇,後歸孫策,甘寧先事黃祖,後歸孫權;張遼先事呂布,徐晃先事楊奉,張郃先事袁紹,賈詡先事李傕、張繡,而後皆歸曹操:孫、曹其主也,劉繇、黃祖、呂布、楊奉等諸人其賓也。代漢當塗之讖,本應在魏,而袁公路謬以自許:魏其主也,袁公路其賓也。三馬同槽之夢,本應在司馬氏,而曹操誤以為馬騰父子:司馬氏其主也,馬騰父子其賓也。受禪臺之說,李肅以賺董卓,而曹丕即真焉,司馬炎又即真焉:曹丕,司馬炎其主也,董卓其賓也。且不獨人有賓主也,地亦有之。獻帝自洛陽遷長安,又自長安遷洛陽,而終乃遷於于許昌:許昌其主也,長安、洛陽皆賓也。劉備失徐州,而得荊州:荊州其主也,徐州其賓也。及得兩川,而復失荊州:兩川其主也,而荊州又其賓也。孔明將北伐中原,而先南定蠻方,意不在蠻方而在中原:中原其主也,蠻方其賓也。抑不獨地有賓主也,物亦有之。李儒持鴆酒、短刀、白練以貽帝辯:鴆酒其主也,短刀、白練其賓也。許田打圍,將敘曹操射鹿,先敘玄德射兔:鹿其主也,兔其賓也。赤壁鏖兵,將敘孔明借風,先敘孔明借箭:風其主也,箭其賓也。董承受玉帶,陪之以錦袍:帶其主也,袍其賓也。關公拜受赤兔馬,而陪之以金印、紅袍諸賜:馬其主也,金印等其賓也。曹操掘地得銅雀,而陪之以玉龍、金鳳:雀其主也,龍、鳳其賓也。諸如此類,不可悉數。善讀是書者,可於此悟文章賓主之法。

  《三國》一書,有同樹異枝、同枝異葉、同葉異花、同花異果之妙。作文者以善避為能,又以善犯為能。不犯之而求避之,無所見其避也;惟犯之而後避之,乃見其能避也。如紀宮掖,則寫一何太后,又寫一董太后;寫一伏皇后,又寫一曹皇后;寫一唐貴妃,又寫一董貴人;寫甘、糜二夫人,又寫一孫夫人,又寫一北地王妃;寫魏之甄后、毛后,又寫一張后:而其間無一字相同。紀戚畹,則何進之後,寫一董承,董承之後,又寫一伏完;寫一魏之張緝,又寫一吳之錢尚:而其間亦無一字相同。寫權臣,則董卓之後,又寫李傕、郭汜;傕、汜之後,又寫曹操;曹操之後,又寫一曹丕;曹丕之後,又寫一司馬懿;司馬懿之後,又並寫一師、昭兄弟;師、昭之後,又繼寫一司馬炎,又旁寫一吳之孫綝:而其間亦無一字相同。其他敘兄弟之事,則袁譚與袁尚不睦、劉琦與劉琮不睦,曹丕與曹植亦不睦,而譚與尚皆死,琦與琮一死一不死,丕與植皆不死,不大異乎!敘婚姻之事,則如董卓求婚于孫堅,袁術約婚于呂布,曹操約婚于袁譚,孫權結婚于劉備、又求婚于雲長,而或絕而不許,或許而復絕,或偽約而反成,或真約而不就,不大異乎?至于王允用美人計,周瑜亦用美人計,而一效一不效,則互異;卓、布相惡,傕、汜亦相惡,而一靖一不靖,則互異。獻帝有兩番密詔,則前隱而後彰;馬騰亦有兩番討賊,則前彰而後隱:此其不同者矣。呂布有兩番弑父,而前動于財,後動于色;前則以私滅公,後則假公濟私,此又其不同者矣。趙雲有兩番救主,而前救于陸,後救于水;前則受之主母之手,後則奪之主母之懷:此又其不同者矣。若夫寫水不止一番,寫火亦不止一番。曹操有下邳之水,又有冀州之水;關公有白河之水,又有罾口川之水。呂布有濮陽之火,曹操有烏巢之火,周郎有赤壁之火.陸遜有猇亭之火,徐盛有南徐之火,武侯有博望、新野之火,又有盤蛇谷、上方谷之火:前後曾有絲毫相犯否?甚者孟獲之擒有七,祁山之出有六,中原之伐有九,求其一字之相犯而不可得。妙哉文乎!譬猶樹同是樹,枝同是枝,葉同是葉,花同是花,而其植根、安蒂、吐芳、結子,五色紛披,各成異采。讀者于此,可悟文章有避之一法,又有犯之一法也。

  《三國》一書,有星移斗轉、雨覆風翻之妙。杜少陵詩曰:「天上浮雲如白衣,斯須改變成蒼狗。」此言世事之不可測也。《三國》之文,亦猶是爾。本是何進謀誅宦官,却弄出宦官殺何進,則一變;本是呂布助丁原,却弄出呂布殺丁原,則一變;本是董卓結呂布,却弄出呂布殺董卓,則一變;本是陳宮釋曹操,却弄出陳宮欲殺曹操,則一變;陳宮未殺曹操,反弄出曹操殺陳官,則一變;本是王允不赦傕、汜,却弄出傕、汜殺王允,則一變;本是孫堅與袁術不睦,却弄出袁術致書于孫堅,則一變;本是劉表求救于袁紹,却弄出劉表殺孫堅,則一變;本是昭烈從袁紹以討董卓,却弄出助公孫瓚以攻袁紹,則一變;本是昭烈救徐州,却弄出昭烈取徐州,則一變;本是呂布投徐州,却弄出呂布奪徐州,則一變;本是呂布攻昭烈,却弄出呂布迎昭烈,則一變;本是呂布絕袁術,又弄出呂布求袁術,則一變;本是昭烈助呂布以討袁術,又弄出助曹操以殺呂布,則一變;本是昭烈助曹操,又弄出昭烈討曹操,則一變;本是昭烈攻袁紹,又弄出昭烈投袁紹,則一變;本是昭烈助袁紹以攻曹操,又弄出關公助曹操以攻袁紹,則一變;本是關公尋昭烈,又弄出張飛欲殺關公,則一變;本是關公許田欲殺曹操,又弄出華客道放曹操,則一變;本是曹操追昭烈,又弄出昭烈投東吳以破曹操,則一變;本是孫權讐劉表,又弄出魯肅弔劉表、又弔劉琦,則一變;本是孔明助周郎,却弄出周郎欲殺孔明,則一變;本是周郎欲害昭烈,却弄出孫權結婚昭烈,則一變;本是用孫夫人牽制昭烈,却弄出孫夫人助昭烈,則一變;本是孔明氣死周郎,又弄出孔明哭周郎,則一變;本是昭烈不受劉表荊州,却弄出昭烈借荊州,則一變;本是劉璋欲結曹操,却弄出迎昭烈,則一變;本是劉璋迎昭烈,却弄出昭烈奪劉璋,則一變;本是昭烈分荊州,又弄出呂蒙襲荊州,則一變;本是昭烈破東吳,又弄出陸遜敗昭烈,則一變;本是孫權求救于曹丕,卻弄出曹丕欲襲孫權,則一變;本是昭烈讐東吳,又弄出孔明結好東吳,則一變;本是劉封聽孟達,卻弄出劉封攻孟達,則一變;本是孟達背昭烈,又弄出孟達欲歸孔明,則一變;本是馬騰與昭烈同事,又弄出馬超攻昭烈,則一變;本是馬超救劉璋,却弄出馬超投昭烈,則一變;本是姜維敵孔明,却弄出姜維助孔明,則一變;本是夏侯霸助司馬懿,却弄出夏侯霸助姜維,則一變;本是鍾會忌鄧艾,却弄出衛瓘殺鄧艾,則一變;本是姜維賺鍾會,却弄出諸將殺鍾會,則一變;本是羊祜和陸抗,却弄出羊祜請伐孫皓,則一變;本是羊祜請伐吳,却弄出一杜預,又弄出一王濬,則一變。論其呼應有法,則讀前卷定知其有後卷;論其變化無方,則讀前文更不料其有後文。于其可知,見《三國》之文之精;於其不可料,更見《三國》之文之幻矣。

  《三國》一書,有橫雲斷嶺、橫橋鎖溪之妙。文有宜于連者,有宜于斷者。如五關斬將、三顧草廬、七擒孟獲,此文之妙于連者也。如三氣周瑜、六出祁山、九伐中原,此文之妙于斷者也。蓋文之短者,不連敘則不貫串,文之長者,連敘則懼其累墜,故必敘別事以間之,而後文勢乃錯綜盡變。後世稗官家,鮮能及此。

  《三國》一書,有將雪見霰、將雨聞雷之妙。將有一段正文在後,必先有一段閒文以為之引。將有一段大文在後,必先有一段小文以為之端。如將敘曹操濮陽之火,先寫糜竺家中之火一段閒文以啓之;將敘孔融求救于昭烈,先寫孔融通刺于李弘一段閒文以啓之;將敘赤壁縱火一段大文,先寫博望、新野兩段小文以啓之;將敘六出祁山一段大文,先寫七擒孟獲一段小文以啓之是也。魯人將有事于上帝,必先有事于頖宮。文章之妙,正復類是。

  《三國》一書,有浪後波紋、雨後霢霢之妙。凡文之奇者,文前必有先聲,文後亦必有餘勢。如董卓之後,又有從賊以繼之;黃巾之後,又有餘黨以衍之;昭烈三顧草廬之後,又有劉琦三請諸葛一段文字以映帶之;武侯出師一段大文之後,又有姜維伐魏一段文字以蕩漾之是也。諸如此類,皆他書中所未有。

  《三國》一書,有寒冰破熱、涼風掃塵之妙。如關公五關斬將之時,忽有鎮國寺內遇普靜長老一段文字;昭烈躍馬檀溪之時,忽有水鏡莊上遇司馬先生一段文字;孫策虎踞江東之時,忽有遇于吉一段文字;曹操進爵魏王之時,忽有遇左慈一段文字;昭烈三顧草廬之時,忽有遇崔州平席地閒談一段文字;關公水淹七軍之後,忽有玉泉山月下點化一段文字。至于武侯征蠻,而忽逢孟節;陸遜追蜀,而忽遇黃承彥;張任臨敵,而忽間紫虛丈人:昭烈伐吳,而忽問青城老叟:或僧、或道、或隱士、或高人,俱于極喧鬧中求之,真足令人躁思頓清,煩襟盡滌。

  《三國》一書,有笙簫夾鼓、琴瑟間鐘之妙。如正敘黃巾擾亂,忽有何后、董后兩宮爭論一段文字;正敘董卓縱橫,忽有貂蟬鳳儀亭一段文字;正敘傕、汜倡狂,忽有楊彪夫人與郭汜之妻來往一段文字;正敘下邳交戰,忽有呂布送女、嚴氏戀夫一段文字;正敘冀州廝殺,忽有袁譚失妻、曹丕納婦一段文字;正敘荊州事變,忽有蔡夫人商議一段文字;正敘赤壁鏖兵,忽有曹操欲取二喬一段文字;正敘宛城交攻,忽有張濟妻與曹操相遇一段文字;正敘趙雲取桂陽,忽有趙范寡嫂敬酒一段文字;正敘昭烈爭荊州,忽有孫權親妹洞房花燭一段文字;正敘孫權戰黃祖,忽有孫翊妻為夫報讐一段文字;正敘司馬懿殺曹爽,忽有辛憲英為弟畫策一段文字。至于袁紹討曹操之時,忽帶敘鄭康成之婢;曹操救漢中之日,忽帶敘蔡中郎之女:諸如此類,不一而足。人但知《三國》之文是敘龍爭虎鬪之事,而不知為鳳為鸞、為鶯為燕,篇中有應接不暇者。令人于干戈隊裡裏,時見紅裙;旌旗影中,常覩粉黛:殆以豪士傳與美人傳合為一書矣。

  《三國》一書,有隔年下種、先時伏着之妙。善圃者投種于地,待時而發;善奕者下一閒著着于數十著之前,而其應在數十著之後。文章敘事之法,亦猶是已。如西蜀劉璋乃劉焉之子,而首回將敘劉備,先敘劉焉,早為取西川伏下一筆。又于玄德破黃巾時,並敘曹操,帶敘董卓,早為董卓亂國、曹操專權伏下一筆。趙雲歸昭烈在古城聚義之時,而昭烈之遇趙雲,早于磐河戰公孫時伏下一筆。馬超歸昭烈在葭萌戰張飛之後,而昭烈之與馬騰同事,早于受衣帶詔時伏下一筆。龐統歸昭烈在周郎既死之後,而童子述龐統姓名,早于水鏡莊前伏下一筆。武侯嘆「謀事在人、成事在天」在上方谷火滅之後,而司馬徽「未遇其時」之語,崔州平「天不可強」之言,早于三顧草廬前伏下一筆。劉禪帝蜀四十餘年而終,在一百十回之後,而鶴鳴之兆,早于新野初生時伏下一筆。姜維九伐中原在一百五回之後,而武侯之收姜維,早於初出祁山時伏下一筆。姜維與鄧艾相遇,在三伐中原之後,姜維與鐘會相遇,在九伐中原之後,而夏侯霸述兩人姓名,早于未伐中原時伏下一筆。曹丕篡漢,在八十回中,而青雲紫雲之祥,早於三十三回之前伏下一筆。孫權僭號,在八十五回後,而吳夫人夢日之兆,早於三十八回中伏下一筆。司馬篡魏,在一百十九回,而曹操夢馬之兆,早於五十七回中伏下一筆。自此而外,凡伏筆之處,指不勝屈。每見近世稗官家,一到扭捏不來之時,便平空生出一人,無端造出一事,覺後文與前文隔斷,更不相涉。試令讀《三國》之文,能不汗顏?

  《三國》一書,有添絲補錦、移針勻繡之妙。凡敘事之法,此篇所闕者補之於彼篇,上卷所多者勻之於下卷。不但使前文不沓拖,而亦使後文不寂寞;不但使前事無遺漏,而又使後事增渲染:此史家妙品也。如呂布取曹豹之女,本在未奪徐州之前,却于困下邳時敘之;曹操望梅止渴,本在擊張繡之日,却于青梅煮酒時敘之;管甯割席分坐,本在華歆未仕之前,却于破壁取后時敘之;吳夫人夢月,本在將生孫策之前,却于臨終遺命時敘之;武侯求黃氏為配,本在未出草廬之前,却于諸葛瞻死難時敘之。諸如此類,亦指不勝屈。前能留步以應後,後能迴照以應前,令人讀之,真一篇如一句。

  《三國》一書,有近山濃抹、遠樹輕描之妙。畫家之法,于山與樹之近者,則濃之重之;于山與樹之遠者,則輕之淡之。不然,林麓迢遙,峯嵐層叠,豈能于尺幅之中,一一而詳繪之乎?作文亦猶是已。如皇甫嵩破黃巾,只在朱雋一邊打聽得來;袁紹殺公孫瓚,只在曹操一邊打聽得來;趙雲襲南郡,關、張襲兩郡,只在周郎眼中耳中得來;昭烈殺楊奉、韓暹,只在昭烈口中敘來;張飛奪古城,在關公耳中聽來;簡雍投袁紹,在昭烈口中說來。至若曹丕三路伐吳而皆敗,一路用實寫,兩路用虛寫;武侯退曹丕五路之兵,惟遣使入吳用實寫,其四路皆虛寫。諸如此類,又指不勝屈。只一句兩句,正不知包却幾許事情,省却幾許筆墨。

  《三國》一書,有奇峰對插、錦屏對峙之妙。其對之法,有正對者,有反對者,有一卷之中自為對者,有隔數十卷而遙為對者。如昭烈則自幼便大,曹操則自幼便奸。張飛則一味性急,何進則一味性慢。議溫明是董卓無君,殺丁原是呂布無父。袁紹磐河之戰,勝敗無常;孫堅峴山之役,生死不測。馬騰勤王室而無功,不失為忠;曹操報父讐而不果,不得為孝。袁紹起馬步三軍而復回,是力可戰而不斷;昭烈擒王、劉二將而復縱,是勢不敵而從權。孔融薦禰衡,是《緇衣》之好;禰衡罵曹操,是《巷伯》之心。昭烈遇德操,是無意相遭;單福過新野,是有心來謁。曹丕苦逼生曹植,是同氣戈矛;昭烈痛哭死關公,是異姓骨肉。火熄上方谷,是司馬之數當生;燈滅五丈原,是諸葛之命當死。諸如此類,或正對,或反對,皆一回之中而自為對者也。如以國戚害國戚,則有何進;以國戚薦國戚,則有伏完。李肅說呂布,則以智濟其惡;王允說呂布,則以巧行其忠。張飛失徐州,則以飲酒誤事;呂布陷下邳,則以禁酒受殃。關公飲魯肅之酒,是一片神威;羊祜飲陸抗之酒,是一團和氣。孔明不殺孟獲,是仁者之寬;司馬懿必殺公孫淵,是奸雄之刻。關公義釋曹操,是報其德于前;翼德義釋嚴顏,是收其用于後。武侯不用子午谷之計,是慎謀以圖全;鄧艾不懼陰平嶺之危,是行險以徼幸。曹操有病,陳琳一罵便好;王郎無病,孔明一罵便亡。孫夫人好甲兵,是女中丈夫;司馬懿受巾幗,是男中女子。八日而取上庸,則以速而神;百日而取襄平,則以遲而勝。孔明屯田渭濱,是進取主謀,姜維屯田沓中,是退避之計。曹操受漢之九錫,是操之不臣;孫權受魏之九錫,是權之不君。曹操射鹿,義乖于君臣;曹丕射鹿,情動于母子。楊儀、魏延,相爭于班師之日;鄧艾、鍾會,相忌在用兵之時。姜維欲繼孔明之志,人事逆乎天心;杜預能承羊祜之謀,天時應乎人力。諸如此類,或正對,或反對,皆不在一回之中,而遙相為對者也。誠於此較量而比觀焉,豈不足快讀古之胸,而長尚論之識!

  《三國》一書,有首尾大照應、中間大關鎖處。如首回以十常侍為起,而末回有劉禪之寵中貴以結之,又有孫皓之寵中貴以雙結之,此一大照應也。又如首回以黃巾妖術為起,而末回有劉禪之信師婆以結之,又有孫皓之信師婆以雙結之,此一大照應也。照應既在首尾,而中間百餘回之內若無有與前後相關合者,則不成章法矣。于是有伏完之托黃門寄書、孫亮之察黃門盜蜜以關合前後,又有李傕之喜女巫、張魯之用左道以關合前後。凡若此者,皆天造地設,以成全篇之結構者也。然猶不止此也,作者之意,自宦官、妖術而外,尤重在嚴誅亂臣賊子,以自附於《春秋》之義,故書中多錄討賊之忠,紀弑君之惡。而首篇之末,則終之以張飛之勃然欲殺董卓;末篇之末,則終之以孫皓之隱然欲殺賈充。由此觀之,雖曰演義,直可繼麟經而無愧耳。

  《三國》敘事之佳,直與《史記》彷彿;而其敘事之難,則有倍難于《史記》者。《史記》各國分書,各人分載,于是有本紀、世家、列傳之別。今《三國》則不然,殆合本紀、世家、列傳而總成一篇。分則文短而易工,合則文長而難好也。

  讀《三國》勝讀《列國志》。夫《左傳》、《國語》,誠文章之最佳者,然左氏依經而立傳,經既逐段各自成文,傳亦逐段各自成文,不相聯屬也。《國語》則離經而自為一書,可以聯屬矣,究竟《周語》、《魯語》、《晉語》、《鄭語》、《齊語》、《楚語》、《吳語》、《越語》,八國分作八篇,亦不相聯屬也。後人合《左傳》、《國語》而為《列國志》,因國多事煩,其段落處到底不能貫串。今《三國演義》,自首至尾讀之,無一處可斷,其書又在《列國志》之上。

  讀《三國》勝讀《西遊記》。《西遊》捏造妖魔之事,誕而不經,不若《三國》實敘帝王之事,真而可考也。且《西遊》好處,《三國》已皆有之。如啞泉、黑泉之類,何異子母河、落胎泉之奇。朵思大王、木鹿大王之類,何異牛魔、鹿力、金角、銀角之號?伏波顯聖,山神指迷之類,何異南海觀音之救?只一卷漢相南征記,便抵得一部《西遊記》矣。至于前而鎮國寺,後而玉泉山,或目視戒刀,脫離火厄,或望空一語,有同棒喝:豈必誦「靈台方寸」、「斜月三星」之文,乃悟禪心乎哉!

  讀《三國》勝讀《水滸傳》。《水滸》文字之真,雖較勝《西遊》之幻,然無中生有、任意起滅,其匠心不難,終不若《三國》敘一定之事,無容改易而卒能匠心之為難也。且三國人才之盛,寫來各各出色,又有高出于吳用、公孫勝等萬萬者。吾謂「才子書」之目,宜以《三國演義》為第一。

◀上一回

下一回▶

三國演義