Wan Zhang II

萬章下 · Mencius

Original Chinese text from Chinese Wikisource (public domain). The translation is machine-made and may contain errors. · Original text ↗

Wan Zhang II

1

Mencius said, "Bo Yi would not look at any sight that was not good, nor listen to any sound that was not good. He would not serve any ruler who was not the right ruler, nor employ any people who were not the right people. When there was order, he would advance; when there was chaos, he would retreat. He could not bear to live where oppressive government prevailed or where oppressive people dwelt. He thought that to stay among ordinary folk would be like wearing court robes and court caps and sitting in mud or ashes. In the time of Zhou of Shang, he lived by the northern shore of the sea, waiting for the world to be purified. Therefore, when men of stubborn character heard of Bo Yi's way, they became pure; when men of weak character heard of it, they found the will to stand firm."

"Yi Yin said, 'What ruler should I not serve? What people should I not employ?' When there was order, he advanced; when there was chaos, he also advanced. He said, 'Heaven gave birth to these people so that those who know first may awaken those who know later, and those who are awakened first may awaken those who are awakened later. I am one of Heaven's people who has been awakened first; I will use this Way to awaken these people.' He thought that if anywhere in the world there was a common man or common woman who did not receive the blessings of Yao and Shun, it was as if he himself had pushed them into a ditch. Such was his readiness to take the weight of the world upon himself."

"Hui of Liu Xia was not ashamed to serve a corrupt ruler, nor did he refuse a small office. When advanced, he did not conceal his talents but always acted according to principle. When passed over, he bore no grudge; when in hardship, he felt no resentment. When staying among ordinary folk, he was content and could not bear to leave. 'You are you, and I am I. Even if you were to stand naked beside me, how could you defile me?' Therefore, when men of narrow character heard of Hui of Liu Xia's way, they became broad-minded; when men of shallow character heard of it, they became deep."

"When Confucius left Qi, he departed immediately, straining the grain from his cooking. When he left Lu, he said, 'This is how slowly I leave.' That was the way to leave one's ancestral state. When it was right to leave quickly, he left quickly; when it was right to stay long, he stayed long; when it was right to remain in retirement, he remained in retirement; when it was right to take office, he took office. That was Confucius."

Mencius said, "Bo Yi was the pure one among the sages; Yi Yin was the one who took responsibility among the sages; Hui of Liu Xia was the harmonious one among the sages; Confucius was the timely one among the sages. Confucius is called the one who gathered greatness into one. The one who gathered greatness into one is like the ringing of metal followed by the resonance of jade. The ringing of metal is the beginning of order; the resonance of jade is the completion of order. The beginning of order is the work of wisdom; the completion of order is the work of sagehood. Wisdom is like skill; sagehood is like strength. In shooting at a target a hundred paces away: reaching it is a matter of your strength; hitting it is not a matter of your strength."

2

Bei Gong She asked, "What was the system of ranks and emoluments in the Zhou house?"

Mencius said, "The full details cannot be heard, because the feudal lords found them harmful to themselves and destroyed the records. However, I have heard the outline. The Son of Heaven occupied one rank; the duke occupied one rank; the marquis occupied one rank; the earl occupied one rank; the viscount and the baron shared one rank—in all, five ranks. The ruler occupied one rank; the minister occupied one rank; the grand master occupied one rank; the senior shi occupied one rank; the middle shi occupied one rank; the junior shi occupied one rank—in all, six ranks. The domain of the Son of Heaven was a thousand li square; the duke and marquis each had a hundred li square; the earl had seventy li square; the viscount and baron had fifty li square—in all, four grades. Those who could not provide fifty li square did not have direct access to the Son of Heaven but were attached to a feudal lord and called 'attached territories.' The ministers of the Son of Heaven received territory comparable to that of a marquis; the grand masters received territory comparable to that of an earl; the senior shi received territory comparable to that of a viscount or baron. In a large state of a hundred li square, the ruler's emolument was ten times that of a minister; a minister's emolument was four times that of a grand master; a grand master's emolument was twice that of a senior shi; a senior shi's emolument was twice that of a middle shi; a middle shi's emolument was twice that of a junior shi; the junior shi had the same emolument as commoners in office, an emolument sufficient to replace their farming. In a medium state of seventy li square, the ruler's emolument was ten times that of a minister; a minister's emolument was three times that of a grand master; a grand master's emolument was twice that of a senior shi; a senior shi's emolument was twice that of a middle shi; a middle shi's emolument was twice that of a junior shi; the junior shi had the same emolument as commoners in office, an emolument sufficient to replace their farming. In a small state of fifty li square, the ruler's emolument was ten times that of a minister; a minister's emolument was two times that of a grand master; a grand master's emolument was twice that of a senior shi; a senior shi's emolument was twice that of a middle shi; a middle shi's emolument was twice that of a junior shi; the junior shi had the same emolument as commoners in office, an emolument sufficient to replace their farming. As for what farmers obtained, one man received a hundred mu. From a hundred mu, a superior farmer could feed nine people; the next grade, eight; the middle grade, seven; the next below, six; the lowest grade, five. The emoluments of commoners in office were graded accordingly."

3

Wan Zhang asked, "May I ask about friendship?"

Mencius said, "Do not presume upon age, do not presume upon rank, do not presume upon family connections in being friends. To be friends is to be friends with their virtue; one must not presume upon anything else. Meng Xian Zi, a household of a hundred war chariots, had five friends: Yue Zheng Qiu and Mu Zhong. The other three I have forgotten. When Meng Xian Zi was friends with these five, he did not think of his own household. If these five had thought of Meng Xian Zi's household, he would not have befriended them. It is not only in households of a hundred war chariots that this is so; even the rulers of small states had such friends. Duke Hui of Bi said, 'I treated Zi Si as my teacher; I treated Yan Ban as my friend; Wang Shun and Chang Xi served me.' It is not only the rulers of small states that this is so; even the rulers of large states had such ones. Duke Ping of Jin, in his dealings with Hai Tang, would enter when told to enter, sit when told to sit, and eat when told to eat. Even with coarse food and vegetable soup, he was never not full, because he dared not fail to eat his fill. Yet it remained only at this. He did not share with him the position of Heaven, did not share with him the duties of Heaven, did not share with him the emoluments of Heaven. This is how a scholar honors the worthy, not how a king or duke honors the worthy. When Shun had an audience with the Emperor, the Emperor lodged his son-in-law in the second palace, and also feasted Shun, the two alternating as host and guest. Here was the Son of Heaven being friends with a common man. The lower honoring the upper is called honoring rank; the upper honoring the lower is called honoring the worthy. Honoring rank and honoring the worthy share the same principle."

4

Wan Zhang said, "May I ask what the mind should be in social dealings?"

Mencius said, "Respectfulness."

He said, "If one declines and declines, that is disrespectful, is it not?"

Mencius said, "When a person of rank gives a gift, and one says, 'Was what he took taken rightly or not rightly?' and only then accepts it, this is considered disrespectful. Therefore one does not decline."

He said, "May I ask if one may not decline with words but decline in one's mind, saying to oneself, 'This was taken from the people unrighteously,' and refuse to accept it for some other reason—would that not be permissible?"

Mencius said, "If his dealings with one are according to principle, and his offering is according to ritual, then Confucius would have accepted it."

Wan Zhang said, "Suppose there is a highwayman who waylays people outside the city gate. If his dealings with one are according to principle and his gift is according to ritual, may one accept it from a highwayman?"

"No," he said. "The Kang gao says: 'Those who kill people and seize their goods, who are reckless and fearless of death—among the people, none will not hate them.' Such persons may be put to death without prior instruction. What Yin received from Xia, and Zhou received from Yin, involved no refusal of such punishment. That this practice has become even more severe today—how could one accept such a practice?"

"Now the feudal lords of today take from the people as if they were plunderers. Yet it is said, 'If one handles the rites of hospitality properly, the gentleman will accept it.' May I ask what this means?"

"Do you suppose that if a true king were to arise, he would execute all the present feudal lords? Or would he first instruct them and only execute them if they refused to reform? To call one who takes what does not belong to him a robber is an extension of the concept of righteousness to its utmost limit. When Confucius served in Lu, the people of Lu competed in hunting, and Confucius also competed in hunting. If even competing in hunting was acceptable, how much more so accepting a gift?"

"Then was Confucius's service not for the sake of practicing the Way?"

"It was for the sake of practicing the Way."

"If it was for the sake of practicing the Way, why did he compete in hunting?"

"Confucius first established proper records and standardized the sacrificial vessels, and did not use food from the four directions to supply the standardized offerings."

"Then why did he not leave?"

"He first tested the situation. If the test showed that the Way could be put into practice, and it was still not practiced, then then would he leave. That is why he never remained in any place for a full three years. Confucius had service where the Way could be practiced, service where the courtesies were acceptable, and service where the ruler provided sustenance. With Jihuanzi, it was service where the Way could be practiced; with Duke Ling of Wei, it was service where the courtesies were acceptable; with Duke Xiao of Wei, it was service where the ruler provided sustenance."

Mencius said: "To serve is not because of poverty, yet sometimes it is because of poverty. To take a wife is not to care for one's parents, yet sometimes it is to care for one's parents. One who serves because of poverty should decline high positions and accept low ones, decline wealth and accept poverty. If one declines high positions and accepts low ones, declines wealth and accepts poverty, what would be appropriate? To be a gatekeeper or a night watchman. Confucius once served as a granary keeper and said, 'The accounts are all correct, that is all.' He once served as an overseer of cattle and sheep and said, 'The cattle and sheep are thriving and growing, that is all.' To speak of high matters while in a low position is a fault. To stand in a ruler's court and fail to practice the Way is a shame."

Wan Zhang said: "Why does a scholar not lodge with a feudal lord?"

Mencius said: "He does not dare to. When a feudal lord loses his state and then lodges with another feudal lord, that is in accordance with ritual propriety. For a scholar to lodge with a feudal lord is not in accordance with ritual propriety."

Wan Zhang said: "If a ruler sends him grain, does he accept it?"

"He accepts it."

"What is the principle in accepting it?"

"The ruler regards the common people as his subjects and provides for them accordingly."

"If he accepts provision but does not accept gifts, why is that?"

"He does not dare to."

"May I ask why he does not dare to?"

"Gatekeepers and night watchmen all have regular duties by which they are fed by their superiors. To receive gifts without having regular duties is considered disrespectful."

"If the ruler sends provisions and he accepts them, I do not know whether this can be continued regularly?"

"Duke Mu frequently inquired after Zisi and frequently sent him cooked meat. Zisi was displeased. Finally, he dismissed the messenger outside the main gate, bowed with his face to the north, and declined the gift, saying: 'From now on I know that the ruler keeps me like a dog or a horse.' From then on, the messenger was no longer sent. If one delights in the worthy but cannot promote them, and also cannot properly support them, can this be called delighting in the worthy?"

"May I ask how a ruler who wishes to support a gentleman should do so in order to be said to support him properly?"

"He sends it with a royal command, and the gentleman bows twice with his head to the ground and accepts it. After that, the granary keeper continues to supply grain, and the cook continues to supply meat, without using a royal command. Zisi thought that being made to bow repeatedly because of cooked meat was not the way to support a gentleman. Yao treated Shun by sending nine of his sons to serve him, giving him two daughters in marriage, and providing officials, cattle, granaries, and provisions to support Shun while he was in the fields, and later raised him to the highest position. Therefore it is said that this is how kings and dukes honor the worthy."

Wan Zhang said: "May I ask what is the principle behind not going to see the feudal lords?"

Mencius said: "In the city, they are called market-quarter officials; in the countryside, they are called grass-and-plain officials. Both are called commoners. A commoner does not present the pledge of service to become a minister and does not dare to appear before a feudal lord. This is in accordance with ritual propriety."

Wan Zhang said: "When a commoner is summoned for labor service, he goes. But when a ruler wishes to see him and summons him, he does not go. Why is that?"

"Going to labor service is proper; going to be seen is improper. Moreover, why does the ruler wish to see him?"

"Because he has much knowledge, because he is worthy."

"If it is because he has much knowledge, even the Son of Heaven does not summon a teacher—how much less would a feudal lord? If it is because he is worthy, I have never heard of one who wishes to see a worthy person summoning him. Duke Mu frequently went to see Zisi and said: 'In ancient times, a state of a thousand chariots befriended scholars—how was that?' Zisi was displeased and said: 'The ancients had a saying: "Serve them, you say." How can you say "Befriend them"?' Was Zisi's displeasure not because he thought: 'In terms of position, you are the ruler and I am the minister—how dare I befriend the ruler? In terms of virtue, you should be serving me—how can you befriend me?' A ruler of a thousand chariots sought to befriend a scholar and could not achieve it—how much less could he summon him? Duke Jing of Yi went hunting and summoned the gamekeeper with a pennant. The gamekeeper did not come, and the duke was about to execute him. 'A man of purpose does not forget that he may end up in a ditch; a brave man does not forget that he may lose his head.' What did Confucius approve of here? He approved that one does not go when summoned with an improper token."

"May I ask how the gamekeeper should be summoned?"

"With a leather cap. A commoner is summoned with a banner of plain cloth; a scholar with a flag; a grandee with a pennant. If one summons a gamekeeper with the token for a grandee, the gamekeeper would die rather than go. If one summons a commoner with the token for a scholar, would the commoner dare to go? How much less would a worthy person go when summoned with the token of an unworthy person? To wish to see a worthy person but not do so by the proper way is like wishing him to enter while closing the gate. Righteousness is the road; ritual propriety is the gate. Only the gentleman can walk this road and pass through this gate. The Odes say: 'The road of Zhou is smooth as a whetstone, straight as an arrow. It is what the gentleman walks upon, and what the common people look to.'"

Wan Zhang said: "When Confucius received the ruler's summons, he went without waiting for the horses to be harnessed. Was Confucius then wrong?"

"Confucius at that time held an office and had official duties, and he was summoned in his official capacity."

Mengzi said to Wan Zhang, "A good man of a village befriends the good men of that village; a good man of a state befriends the good men of that state; a good man of the world befriends the good men of the world. And when he considers befriending the good men of the world to be insufficient, he goes on to discuss the people of antiquity. He recites their poetry, reads their books—but can he do so without knowing what kind of men they were? For this reason, he examines the age in which they lived. This is to befriend them across the ages."

9

King Xuan of Qi asked about the chief ministers. Mengzi said, "What kind of chief minister is Your Majesty asking about?"

The King said, "Are chief ministers different from one another?"

Mengzi said, "They are different. There are chief ministers of the royal lineage and chief ministers of other surnames."

The King said, "I would ask about a chief minister of the royal lineage."

Mengzi said, "If the ruler commits a great fault, he remonstrates with him. If, after repeated remonstrance, the ruler does not listen, he deposes him."

The King's expression changed abruptly.

Mengzi said, "Do not take offense, Your Majesty. You asked your minister, and I dare not answer except with rectitude."

When the King's composure was restored, he then asked about a chief minister of another surname.

Mengzi said, "If the ruler commits a fault, he remonstrates with him. If, after repeated remonstrance, the ruler does not listen, he leaves."

萬章下

1

孟子曰:「伯夷目不視惡色,耳不聽惡聲。非其君不事,非其民不使。治則進,亂則退。橫政之所出,橫民之所止,不忍居也。思與鄉人處,如以朝衣朝冠坐於涂炭也。當紂之時,居北海之濱,以待天下之清也。故聞伯夷之風者,頑夫廉,懦夫有立志。」

「伊尹曰:『何事非君?何使非民?』治亦進,亂亦進。曰:『天之生斯民也,使先知覺後知,使先覺覺後覺。予,天民之先覺者也;予將以此道覺此民也。』思天下之民匹夫匹婦有不與被堯舜之澤者,如己推而內之溝中。其自任以天下之重也。」

「柳下惠,不羞污君,不辭小官;進不隱賢,必以其道;遺佚而不怨,厄窮而不憫。與鄉人處,由由然不忍去也。『爾為爾,我為我,雖袒裼裸裎於我側,爾焉能浼我哉?』故聞柳下惠之風者,鄙夫寬,薄夫敦。」

「孔子之去齊,接淅而行;去魯,曰:『遲遲吾行也。』去父母國之道也。可以速而速,可以久而久,可以處而處,可以仕而仕,孔子也。」

孟子曰:「伯夷,聖之清者也;伊尹,聖之任者也;柳下惠,聖之和者也;孔子,聖之時者也。孔子之謂集大成。集大成也者,金聲而玉振之也。金聲也者,始條理也;玉振之也者,終條理也。始條理者,智之事也;終條理者,聖之事也。智,譬則巧也;聖,譬則力也。由射於百步之外也;其至,爾力也;其中,非爾力也。」

2

北宫𨪆問曰:「周室班爵祿也,如之何?」

孟子曰:「其詳不可得聞也,諸侯惡其害己也,而皆去其籍。然而軻也嘗聞其略也。天子一位,公一位,侯一位,伯一位,子、男同一位,凡五等也。君一位,卿一位,大夫一位,上士一位,中士一位,下士一位,凡六等。天子之制,地方千里,公侯皆方百里,伯七十里,子、男五十里,凡四等。不能五十里,不達於天子,附於諸侯,曰附庸。天子之卿受地視侯,大夫受地視伯,元士受地視子、男。大國地方百里,君十卿祿,卿祿四大夫,大夫倍上士,上士倍中士,中士倍下士,下士與庶人在官者同祿,祿足以代其耕也。次國地方七十里,君十卿祿,卿祿三大夫,大夫倍上士,上士倍中士,中士倍下士,下士與庶人在官者同祿,祿足以代其耕也。小國地方五十里,君十卿祿,卿祿二大夫,大夫倍上士,上士倍中士,中士倍下士,下士與庶人在官者同祿,祿足以代其耕也。耕者之所獲,一夫百畝;百畝之糞,上農夫食九人,上次食八人,中食七人,中次食六人,下食五人。庶人在官者,其祿以是為差。

3

萬章問曰:「敢問友。」

孟子曰:「不挾長,不挾貴,不挾兄弟而友。友也者,友其德也,不可以有挾也。孟獻子,百乘之家也,有友五人焉:樂正裘、牧仲,其三人則予忘之矣。獻子之與此五人者友也,無獻子之家者也。此五人者亦有獻子之家,則不與之友矣。非惟百乘之家為然也,雖小國之君亦有之。費惠公曰:『吾於子思則師之矣,吾於顏般則友之矣,王順、長息,則事我者也。』非惟小國之君為然也,雖大國之君亦有之。晉平公之於亥唐也,入云則入,坐云則坐,食云則食。雖疏食菜羹,未嘗不飽,蓋不敢不飽也。然終於此而已矣,弗與共天位也,弗與治天職也,弗與食天祿也。士之尊賢者也,非王公之尊賢也。舜尚見帝,帝館甥于貳室,亦饗舜,迭為賓主,是天子而友匹夫也。用下敬上,謂之貴貴;用上敬下,謂之尊賢。貴貴、尊賢,其義一也。」

4

萬章曰:「敢問交際何心也?」

孟子曰:「恭也。」

曰:「卻之卻之為不恭,何哉?」

曰:「尊者賜之,曰:『其所取之者,義乎不義乎?』而後受之,以是為不恭,故弗卻也。」

曰:「請無以辭卻之,以心卻之,曰:『其取諸民之不義也。』而以他辭無受,不可乎?」

曰:「其交也以道,其接也以禮,斯孔子受之矣。」

萬章曰:「今有御人於國門之外者,其交也以道,其饋也以禮,斯可受御與?」

曰:「不可。《康誥》曰:『殺越人于貨,閔不畏死,凡民罔不譈』是不待教而誅者也。殷受夏,周受殷,所不辭也,於今為烈,如之何其受之?」

曰:「今之諸侯取之於民也,猶御也。『茍善其禮際矣,斯君子受之』,敢問何說也?」

曰:「子以為有王者作,將比今之諸侯而誅之乎?其教之不改而後誅之乎?夫謂非其有而取之者盜也,充類至義之盡也。孔子之仕於魯也,魯人獵較,孔子亦獵較。獵較猶可,而況受其賜乎?」

曰:「然則孔子之仕也,非事道與?」

曰:「事道也。」

「事道奚獵較也?」

曰:「孔子先簿正祭器,不以四方之食供簿正。」

曰:「奚不去也?」

曰:「為之兆也,兆足以行矣,而不行,而後去;是以未嘗有所終三年淹也。孔子有見行可之仕,有際可之仕,有公養之仕。於季桓子,見行可之仕也;於衛靈公,際可之仕也;於衛孝公,公養之仕也。」

5

孟子曰:「仕非為貧也,而有時乎為貧;娶妻非為養也,而有時乎為養。為貧者,辭尊居卑,辭富居貧。辭尊居卑,辭富居貧,惡乎宜乎?抱關擊柝。孔子嘗為委吏矣,曰:『會計當而已矣。』嘗為乘田矣,曰:『牛羊茁壯,長而已矣。』位卑而言高,罪也。立乎人之本朝而道不行,恥也。」

6

萬章曰:「士之不托諸侯,何也?」

孟子曰:「不敢也。諸侯失國而後托於諸侯,禮也。士之托於諸侯,非禮也。」

萬章曰:「君饋之粟,則受之乎?」

曰:「受之。」

「受之何義也?」

曰:「君之於氓也,固周之。」

曰:「周之則受,賜之則不受,何也?」

曰:「不敢也。」

曰:「敢問其不敢何也?」

曰:「抱關擊柝者,皆有常職以食於上。無常職而賜於上者,以為不恭也。」

曰:「君饋之,則受之,不識可常繼乎?」

曰:「繆公之於子思也,亟問,亟饋鼎肉。子思不悅,於卒也標使者出諸大門之外,北面稽首再拜而不受,曰:『今而後知君之犬馬畜汲!』蓋自是臺無饋也。悅賢不能舉,又不能養也,可謂悅賢乎?」

曰:「敢問國君欲養君子,如何斯可謂養矣?」

曰:「以君命將之,再拜稽首而受;其後廩人繼粟,庖人繼肉,不以君命將之。子思以為鼎肉使己僕僕爾亟拜也,非養君子之道也。堯之於舜也,使其子九男事之,二女女焉,百官牛羊倉廩備,以養舜於畎畝之中,後舉而加諸上位。故曰王公之尊賢者也。」

7

萬章曰:「敢問不見諸侯,何義也?」

孟子曰:「在國曰市井之臣,在野曰草莽之臣,皆謂庶人。庶人不傳質為臣,不敢見於諸侯,禮也。」

萬章曰:「庶人,召之役,則往役;君欲見之,召之,則不往見之,何也?」

曰:「往役,義也;往見,不義也。且君之欲見之也,何為也哉?」

曰:「為其多聞也,為其賢也。」

曰:「為其多聞也,則天子不召師,而況諸侯乎?為其賢也,則吾未聞欲見賢而召之也。繆公亟見於子思,曰:『古千乘之國以友士,何如?』子思不悅,曰:『古之人有言曰:「事之云乎」,豈曰友之云乎?』子思之不悅也,豈不曰:『以位,則子,君也,我,臣也,何敢與君友也?以德,則子事我者也,奚可以與我友?』千乘之君求與之友,而不可得也,而況可召與?齊景公田,招虞人以旌;不至,將殺之。『志士不忘在溝壑,勇士不忘喪其元。』孔子奚取焉?取非其招不往也。」

曰:「敢問招虞人何以?」

曰:「以皮冠。庶人以旃,士以旗,大夫以旌。以大夫之招招虞人,虞人死不敢往;以士之招招庶人,庶人豈敢往哉?況乎以不賢人之招招賢人乎?欲見賢人而不以其道,猶欲其入而閉之門也。夫義,路也;禮,門也。惟君子能由是路,出入是門也。《詩》云:『周道如底,其直如矢;君子所履,小人所視。』」

萬章曰:「孔子『君命召,不俟駕而行』。然則孔子非與?」

曰:「孔子當仕有官職,而以其官召之也。」

8

孟子謂萬章曰:「一鄉之善士,斯友一鄉之善士;一國之善士,斯友一國之善士;天下之善士,斯友天下之善士。以友天下之善士為未足,又尚論古之人。頌其詩,讀其書,不知其人,可乎?是以論其世也。是尚友也。」

9

齊宣王問卿。孟子曰:「王何卿之問也?」

王曰:「卿不同乎?」

曰:「不同,有貴戚之卿,有異姓之卿。」

王曰:「請問貴戚之卿。」

曰:「君有大過則諫,反覆之而不聽,則易位。」

王勃然變乎色。

曰:「王勿異也。王問臣,臣不敢不以正對。」

王色定,然後請問異姓之卿。

曰:「君有過則諫,反覆之而不聽,則去。」

上一篇 回目录 下一篇