Preface

序 · Water Margin

Original Chinese text from Chinese Wikisource (public domain). The translation is machine-made and may contain errors. · Original text ↗

Preface

Preface to *The Complete Loyal and Righteous Water Margin*

Sima Qian said: "The *Shuo Nan* and *Gu Fen* were works born of sages' indignation." From this we may observe that the sages of antiquity would not write unless they were moved by indignation. To write without indignation is like shivering without cold or groaning without illness—what could be more shameful? Even if one writes, of what value is it?

*Water Margin* is a work born of indignation. Ever since the Song dynasty declined, the proper order of things was inverted: great worthies were placed below, and the unworthy were placed above, until eventually the barbarians were placed above and the Central Plains below. For a time, rulers and ministers alike were like sparrows nesting in the hall, offering tribute, styling themselves as subjects, and willingly kneeling before dogs and sheep! Masters Shi [Nai'an] and Luo [Guanzhong] lived under the Yuan but their hearts remained with the Song. Though born in the Yuan era, they were indignant over Song affairs. Thus, indignant over the Northern Captivity of the two emperors, they wrote of the great defeat of the Liao to vent their indignation; indignant over the complacent peace of the Southern Crossing, they wrote of the suppression of the three rebels to vent their indignation. Who, then, is it that vents this indignation? It is the mighty men who once gathered in arms at Water Margin. One cannot deny that they are loyal and righteous. This is why Masters Shi and Luo transmitted the story of *Water Margin* and further styled their work "Loyal and Righteous." Why should loyalty and righteousness be attributed to Water Margin? The reason may be understood. Why is every one of the Water Margin band loyal and righteous? The cause that brought this about may be understood.

Now, for lesser virtue to serve greater virtue, and for lesser worthiness to serve greater worthiness—this is principle. But if the lesser worthy is served by others while the greater worthy is made to serve others, would he willingly serve without feeling shame? This is like binding others with little strength while being bound by those of great strength—would one willingly bind one's own hands and offer no protest? The inevitable result is that all the greatly strong and greatly worthy in the world would be driven to find refuge at Water Margin. Thus it may be said that the band at Water Margin are all greatly strong and greatly worthy men, men of loyalty and righteousness. Yet there was none so loyal and righteous as Song Jiang. Now, the hundred and eight men shared the same merits, the same faults, the same death, the same life; their hearts of loyalty and righteousness were the same as Song Jiang's. Song Jiang alone, though his body dwelt at Water Margin, his heart remained with the court above. With single-minded devotion he sought amnesty, dedicating himself to serving the state. In the end he braved great peril, achieved great merit, took poison, and died without flinching. Such is the fiery intensity of loyalty and righteousness! Truly it was enough to win the hearts of the hundred and eight men, and thus he was able to forge the brotherhood of Liang Mountain and become the lord of the hundred and eight. In the final campaign against Fang La, more than half of the hundred and eight had already fallen in battle. Then too, Zhishen attained parinirvana at Liuhe; Yan Qing wept and took leave of his master; the two youths devised their plan on the turbid river. Song Jiang was not unaware of these things; yet he regarded the prudence of recognizing the moment and preserving oneself as nothing more than the small man's scheme for self-preservation, utterly unworthy of one loyal to his lord and righteous to his friends. Such was Song Jiang. This is why it is called "Loyal and Righteous."

Can such a work be transmitted without being written? Can such a work be written without being read? Therefore, those who hold a state must not fail to read it. Let them read this work for a single day, and "loyalty and righteousness" will no longer reside at Water Margin but will be found entirely at the ruler's side. Worthy chief ministers must not fail to read it. Let them read this work for a single day, and "loyalty and righteousness" will no longer reside at Water Margin but will be found entirely at the court. The Ministry of War holds the pivot of military and state affairs, and the Regional Commander bears responsibility beyond the borders—they too must not fail to read it. If but for a single day they read this work, then loyalty and righteousness will no longer reside at Water Margin but will be found entirely among the chosen defenders and trusted ministers of the state. If not at the court, not at the ruler's side, not among the defenders and trusted ministers—where then would they be? At Water Margin. This is why the work was born of indignation. As for those who delight in it as material for conversation, or those who draw on it for military strategy—these merely take from it what each finds useful. What do they know of what is meant by loyalty and righteousness!

Written by Li Zhi of Zhuoling, styled Zhuowu.

---

**Short Introduction**

In my service to Master Zhuowu, both in outward bearing and in the submission of my heart, there was nothing that was not Master Zhuowu. I spoke only the Master's words; I read only what the Master read. Some called me mad; some called me obsessed. I forgot myself; I knew only Master Zhuowu. Since the Master's passing, his name has grown ever more honored, his Way ever more widely embraced, his books ever more broadly circulated. Even a single note or stray phrase of his that survives in the world is treasured as sacred grass, and all wish to bow before it. How magnificent! His immortality may be foretold. Yet those who marvel at his writings are seven in ten, while those who marvel at the man himself are three in ten. Search within their breasts, and none of them truly possess Master Zhuowu.

Since my travels to Wu, when I visited Vice-Prefect Chen Wuyi, I came to know Yuan Wuya. Before our greetings were complete, he asked first of the Master, and the sincerity of his private devotion shone from his brow. It seemed his breast must harbor one like Zhuowu. From then on, in our several meetings and conversations, talk always turned to Old Zhuo. He sought the Master's remaining words with great urgency, and sought the books the Master had annotated with even greater urgency. Was Wuya mad? Was I obsessed? I searched my traveling case and found the two books that Master Zhuowu had annotated and finalized—*Loyal and Righteous Water Margin* and *The Collected Works of Yang Sheng'an*—and I brought them out and entrusted them to him. Wuya was delighted as though he had obtained a treasure and wished to share them with the world. I asked, "Which of the two shall come first?" Wuya said: "*Water Margin* is loyalty and righteousness; loyalty and righteousness is *Water Margin*. Whether they approve or condemn me, the Master's Spring and Autumn Annals is near to this. Let *Water Margin* come first! Let *Water Margin* come first!" I smiled and said: "Just so, just so! Had it not been for the Master, the spirit of *Water Margin* could not have been brought forth; had it not been for Wuya, the spirit of the Master could not have been brought forth. I served Master Zhuowu the longest, yet Wuya has grasped Master Zhuowu most deeply—I am ashamed before Wuya. But had it not been for me, who else could have brought forth Wuya's spirit? I have not failed Master Zhuowu, and Wuya has not failed me on this journey." At this we looked at each other and smiled, brewed tea and drank it together, and read aloud in unison the essay in which Master Zhuowu prefaced *Loyal and Righteous Water Margin*. The raging waves of the Xu River seemed to answer in response. I forgot Wuya; Wuya forgot me; we knew only Master Zhuowu.

Written by Yang Dingjian of Fengli, Chu, aboard a boat on the Xu River.

---

**General Principles of the *Loyal and Righteous Water Margin Fully Transmitted, with Illustrations and Critical Notes***

I. Biographies began with Master Zuo, yet critics still charge his work with fabrication—how much more so, then, with unofficial histories! But where the intent is to exhort and admonish, fabrication incurs no blame. In our age, novelists proliferate, many of them straying from the classics and defying the Way, offering no model for instruction. Occasionally there are those who borrow a theme to convey a lesson, using tales of killing, theft, lust, and falsehood to awaken the reader; yet these are either patchworks rather than complete works, or fabrications rather than things commonly seen. Though they may catch the eye of those who delight in novelty, they truly harm the loss of refined literary tradition. How can they compare to this book, which is orthodox? Former sages ranked it alongside Ban [Gu] and Sima [Qian]; I say it even surpasses Qiu [Ming, i.e., Zuo Qiuming], for it possesses, I believe, the subtle intent of the *Spring and Autumn Annals*. Thus it is fitting that it be called a "biography" [傳].

II. Liangshan Marsh belonged to Yanzhou Prefecture in Shandong. The *Gazetteer* writes it as "Luo" and calls it eight hundred *li*—an exaggeration. Yet in former times, those who wished to level this marsh found it difficult to store the water, so it was not small either. The biography does not speak of "Liangshan" or of "Song Jiang," for it is neither a bandit's territory nor a bandit's man; therefore it is simply named "Water Margin." *Xu* means the water's edge—a hollow phrase. It makes clear that all within the realm are the king's subjects, and Song Jiang dared not claim possession of this marsh. Does it harbor the thought of one dwelling by the sea? Luo's naming of it was subtle indeed!

III. Loyalty and righteousness are the finest qualities in serving one's lord and treating one's friends. Without loyalty and righteousness, a man, though alive, is already dead, and his words, however beautiful, will not be transmitted. These one hundred and eight men are loyalty and righteousness gathered in the mountain forests; these one hundred and twenty chapters are loyalty and righteousness manifested in ink and brush. Lost in the official histories, they are sought in unofficial records; lost among the gentry, they are sought among the common folk. The aim is to move the hearts of gentlemen, while ensuring that petty men too cannot use them to serve their private ends. Thus Master Li added the two characters "Loyalty and Righteousness"—and with good reason!

IV. Books benefit from critical commentary, for it can convey the author's intent and open the reader's mind. When done well, it is like painting in the eyes of a dragon—all its spirit is revealed. When done poorly, it is like slathering paint on a face, defiling what was originally there; it cannot be done carelessly. Now, for the purpose of the entire work, the striking points of each chapter, and the spirit of every sentence and every character, nothing is left unexposed, so that the reader may know that this unofficial history's brush has relevance to the world and benefit to literature, utterly different from the commercial editions of the past. It is like following a musical score and hitting the beat, or needling a bronze acupuncture figure and striking the point—the brush has a tongue and eyes, making things visible and audible. This is what is most prized in critical commentary.

V. This book already depicts every emotion and scene with the vividness of a life portrait—would adding illustrations not be superfluous? And yet, who can perceive literary refinement from a listening to a lute, or see the sage-king Yao from gazing at a wall? Thus the portraits of the Cloud Terrace and the Lingyan Gallery, the illustrations of the "Airs of Bin" and the "Wandering Commoners," can stir viewers to rouse themselves and grieve, their spirits as if face to face with the subjects—so images truly cannot be dispensed with. Now I have devised a new approach, not following old conventions: some are placed outside the chapter headings, some interspersed within the chapters, selecting only the finest and not prizing quantity.

VI. The old edition contained Luo's "preamble," in which were transmitted matters such as the "Granny Lantern Flowers," now no longer to be seen. Later, some reduced the text on account of the "Four Great Bandits" [being censored], and others pared down the one hundred and twenty chapters out of dislike for their length—all losses. The Guo Wuding edition, which is the old edition, moved the matter of Old Woman Yan, which was an improvement. But its removal of Wang [Qing] and Tian [Hu] from among the bandits and addition of the Liao Kingdom was merely the method of a minor craftsman attending to plot symmetry. One who wields a great brush does not act thus—as in the text, Wang Jin opens the book but is never brought to a conclusion. This is what distinguishes it from other novels and makes it, perhaps, the sage of novels!

VII. The old edition removed the tedium of poetry and verse, partly to prevent the narrative thread from breaking, partly to prevent the reader's eye from losing its way—it was quite direct and clear. Yet there are places where such verse serves to depict human demeanor or to give rhythm to the prose, and these cannot be entirely eliminated. I have now made further revisions: in some cases I have altered the original to add what was lacking, in others I have gone against the old version's intent to supplement what was absent. The sole purpose is exhortation and admonition, combined with skillful humor, so that the reader's heart is moved and his lips unsealed, lacking not the effect of deep and lingering reflection.

VIII. The collation of text and annotation of characters in the old edition also showed considerable effort, yet there remained many confused, erroneous, and contradictory places. For example, the very first quoted lyric contains four errors. By comparing this edition with the old, the rest can be understood. Cases such as writing "nai" for "nai" [耐 for 奈] or "zao" for "zao" [躁 for 燥] can still be called mere copyist's errors. But confusing "dai" with "dai" [戴 with 帶], "sha" with "sha" [煞 with 殺], "shuan" with "shuan" [閂 with 拴]; failing to distinguish "chong" from "chong" [冲 from 衝], or "jing" from "jing" [逕 from 竟]—these constitute divergence in meaning. Such cases are too numerous to list; I have now corrected them all. Though placing the pronunciation beneath each character makes for convenient reading, scholars dislike interruptions large and small, so I have gathered them at the end of each chapter for ease of reference. For chapters that are long, the reader may consult by example; where pronunciations differ, they are listed separately. Where half a character can be read or a vulgar meaning can be understood, I have sometimes omitted the note.

IX. One who establishes a text must have a basis. This book creates events from human feeling and originally need not seek corroboration from other works. Moreover, the *Song Jian* and the *Xuanhe Yishi* contain verifiable names and numbers of people, and the *Qilei Leigao* also records the names, stating that Guanzhong [Shi Nai'an] wrote of thirty-six Heavenly Chiefs and seventy-two Earthly Demons. I now place these two texts at the preface, together with the native origins and backgrounds of the one hundred and eight men, both for ease of reference and to aid conversation.

X. One who records events extracts the essentials; one who compiles words probes the profound. Within the biography, Li Kui has already been extracted into the "Shouzhang Biography." Men like Lu Da, Lin Chong, Wu Song, Shi Xiu, Zhang Shun, Li Jun, and Yan Qing could each have a separate biography written to show their full stories. As for the elegant beauty of the phrasing, even the dialect and insults are enough to move the heart. I now specially bring them forth, showing that the gold dust in this book can never be gathered completely. Master Su [Shi] said, "The method of reading is to seek one meaning at a time." If even a novel can possess such beauty, how much more so the official histories!

序

讀《忠義水滸全傳》序

  太史公曰:「《說難》、《孤憤》,聖賢發憤之所作也。」由此觀之,古之聖賢,不憤則不作矣。不憤而作,譬如不寒而顫,不病而呻吟也,可恥孰甚焉?雖作何觀乎?

  《水滸傳》者,發憤之所作也。蓋自宋室不兢,冠履倒施,大賢處下,不肖處上,馴致夷狄處上,中原處下。一時君相,猶然處堂燕雀,納幣稱臣,甘心屈膝於犬羊已矣!施、羅二公,身在元,心在宋,雖生元日,實憤宋事也。是故憤二帝之北狩,則稱大破遼以泄其憤;憤南渡之苟安,則稱勦三寇以泄其憤。敢問洩憤者誰乎?則前日嘯聚水滸之強人也,欲不謂之忠義不可也。是故施、羅二公傳《水滸》,而復以「忠義」名其傳焉。夫忠義何以歸於水滸也,其故可知也;夫水滸之眾,何以一一皆忠義也?所以致之者可知也。

  今夫小德役大德,小賢役大賢,理也。若以小賢役人,而以大賢役於人,其肯甘心服役而不恥乎?是猶以小力縛人,而使大力者縛於人,其肯束手就縛而不辭乎?其勢必至驅天下大力大賢而盡納之水滸矣。則謂水滸之眾,皆大力大賢、有忠有義之人可也。然未有忠義如宋公明者也。今稱一百單八人者,同功同過,同死同生,其忠義之心,猶之乎宋公明也。獨宋公明者,身居水滸之中,心在朝廷之上,一意招安,專圖報國,卒至於犯大難,成大功,服毒自縊,同死而不辭,則忠義之烈也,真足以服一百單八人者之心,故能結義梁山,為一百單八人之主耳。最後南征方臘,一百單八人者陣亡已過半矣。又且智深坐化於六和,燕青涕泣而辭主,二童就計於混江。宋公明非不知也,以為見幾明哲,不過小丈夫自完之計,決非忠於君、義於友者所忍屑矣。是之謂宋公明也,是以謂之「忠義」也。

  傳其可無作歟?傳其可不讀歟?故有國者不可以不讀,一日讀此傳,則「忠義」不在水滸,而皆在於君側矣。賢宰相不可以不讀,一日讀此傳,則「忠義」不在水滸,而皆在於朝廷矣。兵部掌軍國之樞,督府專閫外之寄,是又不可以不讀也,苟一日而讀此傳,則忠義不在水滸,而皆為干城心腹之選矣。否則,不在朝廷,不在君側,不在干城腹心,烏乎在?在水滸。此傳之所為發憤矣。若夫好事者資其譚柄,用兵者藉其謀畫,要以各見所長云耳,烏睹所謂忠義者哉!

    溫陵卓吾李贄撰。

小引

  吾之事卓吾先生也,貌之承而心之委,無非卓吾先生者。非先生之言弗言,非先生之閱弗閱。或曰狂,或曰癖,吾忘吾也,知有卓吾先生而已矣。先生歿而名益尊,道益廣,書益播傳。即片牘單詞,留向人間者,靡不珍為瑤草,儼然欲傾宇內,猗歟盛哉!不朽可卜已。然而奇其文者十七,奇其人者十三,叩爾胸中,則皆未有卓吾先生者也。

  自吾游吳,訪陳無異使君,而得袁無涯氏。揖未竟,輒首問先生,私淑之誠,溢於眉宇,其胸中殆如有卓吾者。嗣是數過從語,語輒及卓老,求卓老遺言甚力,求卓老所批閱之遺書又甚力,無涯氏豈狂耶?癖耶?吾探吾行笥,而卓吾先生所批定《忠義水滸傳》及《楊升庵集》二書與俱,挈以付之。無涯欣然如獲至寶,願公諸世。吾問:「二書孰先?」無涯日:「《水滸》而忠義也,忠義而《水滸》也,知我罪我,卓老之春秋近是。其先《水滸》哉!其先《水滸》哉!」吾笑曰:「唯,唯!非卓老不能發《水滸》之精神,非無涯不能發卓老之精神。吾之事卓吾先生最久,而無涯之得卓吾先生乃最深,吾愧無涯矣!然無涯非吾,亦誰能發無涯之精神者?吾不負卓吾先生,無涯亦不負吾茲遊也。」於是相視而笑,煮茶共啜,取卓吾先生敘《忠義水滸傳》文同聲讀之,胥江怒濤,若或應答。吾忘無涯矣,無涯忘吾矣,知有卓吾先生而已矣。

    楚人鳳里楊定見書於胥江舟次。

《出像評點忠義水滸全傳》發凡

  一、傳始於左氏,論者猶謂其失之誣,況稗說乎!顧意主勸懲,雖誣而不為罪。今世小說家雜出,多離經叛道,不可為訓。間有藉題說法,以殺盜淫妄,行警醒之意者;或飣拾而非全書,或捏飾而非習見;雖動喜新之目,實傷雅道之亡,何若此書之為正耶?昔賢比於班、馬,余謂進於丘明,殆有《春秋》之遺意焉,故允宜稱傳。

  一、梁山泊屬山東兗州府,《志》作濼,稱八百里,張之也。然昔人欲平此泊,而難於貯水,則亦不小矣。傳不言梁山,不言宋江,以非賊地,非賊人,故僅以「水滸」名之。滸,水涯也,虛其辭也。蓋明率土王臣,江非敢據有此泊也。其居海濱之思乎?羅氏之命名微矣!

  一、忠義者,事君處友之善物也。不忠不義,其人雖生已朽,而其言雖美弗傳。此一百八人者,忠義之聚於山林者也;此百廿回者,忠義之見於筆墨者也。失之於正史,求之於稗官;失之於衣冠,求之於草野。蓋欲以動君子,而使小人亦不得藉以行其私,故李氏復加「忠義」二字,有以也夫。

  一、書尚評點,以能通作者之意,開覽者之心也。得則如着毛點睛,畢露神采;失則如批頰塗面,污辱本來,非可苟而已也。今於一部之旨趣,一回之警策,一句一字之精神,無不拈出,使人知此為稗家史筆,有關於世道,有益於文章,與向來坊刻,敻乎不同。如按曲譜而中節,針銅人而中穴,筆頭有舌有眼,使人可見可聞,斯評點所最貴者耳。

  一、此書曲盡情狀,已為寫生,而復益之以繪事,不幾贅乎?雖然,於琴見文,於墻見堯,幾人哉?是以雲臺凌煙之畫,幽風流民之圖,能使觀者感奮悲思,神情如對,則像固不可以已也。今別出新裁,不依舊樣,或特標於目外,或迭采於回中,但拔其尤,不以多為貴也。

  一、古本有羅氏「致語」,相傳「燈花婆婆」等事,既不可復見;乃後人有因四大寇之拘而酌損之者,有嫌一百廿回之繁而淘汰之者,皆失。郭武定本,即舊本,移置閻婆事,甚善;其於寇中去王、田而加遼國,猶是小家照應之法。不知大手筆者,正不爾爾,如本內王進開章而不復收繳,此所以異於諸小說,而為小說之聖也歟!

  一、舊本去詩詞之煩蕪,一慮事緒之斷,一慮眼路之迷,頗直截清明。第有得此以形容人態,頓挫文情者,又未可盡除。茲復為增定:或竄原本而進所有,或逆古意而益所無。惟用勸懲,兼善戲謔,要使覽者動心解頤,不乏詠嘆深長之致耳。

  一、訂文音字,舊本亦具有功力,然淆訛舛駁處尚多。如首引一詞,便有四謬。試以此刻對勘舊本,可知其餘。至如「耐」之為「奈」,「躁」之為「燥」,猶云書錯。若溷「戴」作「帶」,溷「煞」作「殺」,溷「閂」作「拴」;「冲」「衝」之無分,「逕」「竟」之莫辨,遂屬義乖。如此者更難枚舉,今悉校改。其音綴字下,雖便寓目;然大小斷續,通人所嫌,故總次回尾,以便翻查。回遠者例觀,音異者別出。若半字可讀,俗義可通者,或用略焉。

  一、立言者必有所本,是書蓋本情以造事者也,原不必取證他書。況《宋鑒》及《宣和遺事》姓名人數,實有可徵,又《七修類稿》亦載姓名,述貫中三十六天罡、七十二地煞。今以二文弁簡,並列一百八人之里籍出身,亦便覽記,以助談資。

  一、紀事者提要,纂言者鈎玄,傳中李逵已有提為《壽張傳》者矣。如魯達、林冲、武松、石秀、張順、李俊、燕青等,俱可別作一傳,以見始末。至字句之雋好,即方言謔詈,足動人心。今特揭出,見此書碎金,拾之不盡。坡翁謂「讀書之法,當每次作一意求之」,小說尚有如此之美,況正史乎?